-19 karma · joined July 16, 2018
It also works the other way around: CAROL does not want to pay ALICE to have premium access.
Also, laughable that you call me a shill. Seems like the most used argument when you don't agree with someone. I'm not even American. So your "BOB can't switch ISPs" does not even apply here.
Milk companies put their lorries in the highway to deliver their products. You're the one buying milk. Are you the one who's using the highways?
If Netflix wants a premium highway let them pay for it. Otherwise they will have to use the normal highway, the one that's worked fine until Netflix decided to fill it with lorries.
If they want "premium" routes for their MASSIVE traffic, they will have to pay to the ISPs. I think that's reasonable. Giving them premium routes for free would not be neutral, would it? ;)
It gets much worse depending on the country:
Emoji are a vital part of the way we communicate online so some see them as a prime way to push their agenda.
https://outline.com/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fe...
I hope they are proud of doing the obvious. That's like having a webpage and bragging about escaping strings that you insert into a SQL table...
I guess the outrage makes sense when looked from an American point of view where you distrust the government by principle?