954 karma · joined July 10, 2008
My personal headcanon is that the machines were laboring under something akin to Asimov's three laws, which required that they preserve humanity. The Matrix, then is a loophole, something which technically satisfies the requirements of their core programming, but in a way that is advantageous to the machines.
But then, once you've got all those people hooked up, you might as well make some use out of them. They aren't the most efficient battery around, but if you've got to keep them anyway, they might as well serve as a load balancer. The people of Zion just came later and mistook an ancillary benefit for the machine's primary purpose.
Medium.com is essentially just a blog host, isn't it? Seems a bit harsh for one story you didn't like.
By that reasoning, oughtn't we grant the same rights to a sea sponge?
It's not clear to me that animals, as a general class, deserve any particular care or rights beyond what we might extend to living creatures in general. So far as we grants rights to animals, the clear criteria seems to be complexity (especially of the intellectual sort) and closeness to humanity.
I don't know enough about the issue to argue one way or another, but I find it a plausible argument.
Also, one of the early GTAs had networked multiplayer, and I remember doing a fair bit of that when I was younger.
Even if that's the case, you could still plausibly turn three to four people manning a register into four kiosks and one person to assist.
Were they actually able to produce a 9MT weapon, it would be more than half as strong as the largest weapons test the US ever conducted.
Jurors were questioned about this during the voir dire, and several people were dismissed because of an admitted bias in favor of police testimony.
Obviously, this is a sample size of one and no generalizations can be drawn, but it does stand as a counterexample.
Twitch.com redirects to twitch.tv, but was a music site as late as the end of 2014.
That's often true of games too, though, and Twitch has plenty of popular streamers. I think their greater issue is that the steroetypical twitch viewer in their young teens is unlikely to be interested, and older people who might be interested are more likely to be time strapped. Though as I dig around looking for twitch demographics, it looks like the college aged 18-24 is Twitch's biggest group, so there might be a decent overlap.
I wonder if it might be a good idea for them to push the event angle more, with a special focus around on-campus things like hackathons or contests. If you had screen forwarding set up between multiple projects/competitors, it might be interesting to have a "caster" that helped walk viewers through what the different groups were doing.
"Pawluck is also prohibited from posting anything about police or anyone associated with the judicial system."
Why's that?