In fact I'd say both of the things you mention I've mostly seen come from people who are too close to the investor or investor mindset.
1,151 karma · joined January 17, 2013
In fact I'd say both of the things you mention I've mostly seen come from people who are too close to the investor or investor mindset.
That said, it's possible "Follow your Passion!" is still a useful lie... I'm not sure, it's certainly a prevalent lie.
Surely you've had an experience where something you picked up on a single afternoon had more long term value than an entire course?
As I recall it was aimed at the War on Drugs, but as this article points out, unintended consequences have bleed out all over the justice system like the death scene in a B-movie.
http://www.amazon.com/Parkinsons-Law-C-Northcote-Parkinson/d...
The point I'm getting at, is that like any science experiment you need to control for the variables. Just like an economics experiment might control for wealth, or education, you have to control for people who get nervous during interviews, people who have a blind spot for this particular problem, etc.
An easy addition to your methodology would be to have three different problems and let them choose. I would see how that affects their performance.
In my company I give potential hires a test for them to complete at home, before even interviewing them. The average time to complete the test is 6 hours, but we've never had anyone outright refuse to attempt it, and it gives us a giant steaming pile of data. So if my experience is any guide (and it might not be) I would think you could make your test more intensive, and potentially end up with more and better candidates.
http://web.archive.org/web/19990202052243/http://home.earthl...
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/01/18/jonathan_coul...