rho138

So just 7.2 million households in the US. Minimize the marginalized more daddy.

> https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/fo...

Or just subpoena AWS for a copy of their shit and dump them in a hole until it’s unlocked. Yay america.

[flagged]

(¬_¬)

You’re prescribing elegance to a stochastic generator trained on the wealth of humanity, including 4chan. Let’s set our expectations a bit.

[flagged]

Unless you’re every company I’ve worked st over the past 20 years.

No, cogs understand that. Smart employees want to update policies to be an effective mandate versus lip service to the C-suites asshole

Great, so stepping into any organization green where the subvert command is to be unwilling to update policy will enable this.

Lived on the front range for a decade, the alfalfa is obvi the problem. Capitalism drives the need for alfalfa.

Like?

[flagged]

> Conservationism was a reaction to postwar redevelopment, as its proponents claimed. But it was less a reaction to what the modernists destroyed, than to what they created.

Since they’re mostly talking about the US, the thesis here is wrong. Almost all NIMBYism of the era was borne of redlining and white flight in the post-war era, which drove whites out of the cities to the burbs because there were too many “coloreds.” So basically, Americans were - and still are - racist no matter what SCOTUS says.

We shouldn’t be thought of kindly. We’re essentially post food scarcity in the US and children are still sent to school starving. Not only did we fail the here and now, but we’ve failed our future brothers and sisters.

> Opting out of toxic ecosystems is a valid option

Quick, everyone break out the pitchforks for a valid analysis of a game! /s

Don’t look up - or that hubris might crush you.

I’m so confused

This is the first time it’s been posted?

Nah guys, it’s cool, by 2050 the earths atmosphere acidifies for humans and our bodies can’t hold enough phosphorus or calcium for basic metabolic tasks: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-026-01918-5

Is that before or after the earths atmosphere acidifies for humans and our bodies can’t hold enough phosphorus or calcium for basic metabolic tasks? You have until 2050:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-026-01918-5

I appreciate that they’re bringing this study to light… however, none of the source links actually trace back to the quoted study - instead pointing to their own domain or business insider.

That sounds like a massive waste of finite energy and compute resources.

Almost every decom’d vessel that gets blown up for RIMPAC is turned into an artificial reef.

(PDF)

_This_ is the great herculean push for workers rights from Gen X — abolishment of the cruel Standard Time! What a fucking joke that this is what we send people to washington for, while citizens are summarily executed in the streets and cost of living skyrockets.

Lady G, did more harm to the LGBTQIA+ community than the twinks devastating him.

It’s a knee jerk defense proposition that feeds the machine. No one gave a shit until iran launched drones at Amazon datacenters.

Illegal order, next slide.

It upsets me that an establishment like ESO would grip on the “data centers in space” narrative given the absurd physics constraints.

It’s like they’re searching for a gap to fill with a product… where have I seen this go terribly wrong before?