281 karma · joined July 3, 2020
I think the op means it’s nice that the ingredients are given by weight because it is more accurate than volume.
This walks through the creation of a raytracer and a rasterizer in a way that was pretty easy for me to understand. It’s not exhaustive; it’s just right.
Cattle in their current form are a “crop” that sort of sustains humans and their pets. It is likely that this is not an efficient way to sustain humans, but it’s easy and profitable.
What can be done about overfishing of international waters?
It seems that the fish is destined to become another farm animal.
I agree that “studying philosophy” is a worthwhile endeavor, but I align more closely with the parents in regards to memorizing the semi-random litany of data bits that show up in a typical exam. The information is ultimately forgotten and is usually only relevant in the context of the current textbook chapter. Nearly every useful concept that applies to my two separate careers was learned on the job. The time spent in the classroom is nearly irrelevant and could have been replaced entirely by several weeks on the job.
They aren’t wrong; taking the artisan out of fabrication leaves the musician as the sole artistic variable in instrument’s sonic output.
Mass produced wooden instruments still retain unique properties of the trees they were grown from. No two acoustic guitars are the same, even though they came off the assembly line within minutes of each other. Instruments made exclusively from metals and plastics aren’t as likely to have the sonic variations found in wood. This is one of the reasons cymbal companies like Zildjian offer “hand hammered” products.
edit: When I say “They’re not wrong” I don’t mean that I agree with their actions, just that the ideals they hold in regards to artisanship are not without merit. It’s great that nearly any musician can purchase a “handpan” thanks to mass production. Even a very low quality instrument can sound great in the hands of a skilled musician.
*”material” being the relevant information.
I tried to work out edge cases from the beginning; to handle invalid data; to swat the bugs before they appeared.
A bug reared it’s little insectoid head.
Now I’m wading my way through every piece of code that remotely affects the issue and making damn sure that my perfect vision is realised.
On the other hand, fixing a bug in someone else’s code doesn’t have all these personal implications. If I fix the bug without causing regressions I’m a hero! After all, it’s not personal to me.