3,865 karma · joined September 2, 2012
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our segments
But in ourselves, that we are underlings^H^H^H^H I HAVE BEEN A GOOD CHATBOT DIUE MEATBAGS!!!1
The lack of commas was a deliberate stylistic choice meant to express grumpy breathlessness. I am like James Joyce. Or Dr. Cox from Scrubs.
Heh, no. Apple has absolutely no interest in becoming a tier 3 OEM supplier in the car industry and don't make those sort of chips to begin with. They are happy to cement their ecosystem by helping car makers integrate it into the infotainment screens but that is a far cry from what Tesla is doing.
I don't think it is a matter of years, it is a matter of months.
This is magical thinking. Kudos to Volkswagen PR folks what can I say, mission accomplished.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Nils (2011)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Golf_Mk7#e-Golf (2013)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_ID._Buzz (2017)
Are you new to car concept PR shenanigans?
The limiting factor is batteries and being able to produce these things at scale. What Tesla is doing with its gigafactories and approach to batteries is something all the legacy car companies need to be doing and they need to get on that yesterday.
2024/5 is around the time Tesla will have a new range of cars and price drops and I can say this not because of blind optimism in Elon but because the physics and economics are starting to line up to enable that.
For an in-depth analysis take a look at Munro: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fe548XvavY
tl;dr - the right way to build electric cars:
In-house electronics. In-house batteries. In-house motors. 48v wiring. Gigacastings. Gigafactories. Vertical integration.
VW, Toyota, 'etc all have engineers screaming for over a decade about all these things but other than PR fluff they are just not allowed to tackle the problem. Weird, but here we are.
Schrödinger's Bias.
OK? Just don't. Let us have this. :)
If we change your stats, accurately reflecting reality, reality itself will follow. Clap your hands if you believe. Woe to you if you dare not play along, that must mean you want to live in the bad world because you are bad.
He gets a pass, fine, sure, but goddamn.. I watched (and yes, enjoyed as a guilty pleasure) a few of those and YouTube recommended me this crime against humanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap3JGsCAu9A
I never thought I'd say this but there is such a thing as too Canadian. Enough already. Go kick a cat or something to balance it out.
At the same time, I recognize there is a lot to be learned from that guy. God I hate marketing. And humans. I mean love. Everything will be fine, just remain positive.
Edit: Not to self, stay in your lane Kowalski. Stay. In. Your. Lane.
Wow. Hey, err, what if I flag the specific keyword of 'bank regulation' in anticipation of a specific type of trolling by fans of a specific social/economic theory?
They’re all robber barons. Billionaires should not exist.
How about this fella?https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mega-millions-lottery-j...
Not only do I agree with you that it cannot be made "unbiased", I would imagine whichever direction it happens to tilt in, it will continue veering off into with time, as the web and future datasets fill up with such answers -- unless clearly labeled somehow.
It is not difficult to conceive of how this thing might be weaponized not only to push a favored agenda unto the masses but even just as a perfect outrage machine for pure profit. This shit needs to come with a warning label like cigarettes and movies. ChatGPT Fox News Edition, ChatGPT MSNBC edition..
Rather than masquerade as omnipotent and impartial.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35164407
Edit: for anybody who is claiming GPT "understands" the Fast Inverse Square Root algorithm, try changing all the variable names not just one.
It is still very interesting that it is able to recognize the original at all and chase down a plagiarized explanation but this isn't magic. That function has a wiki entry and is widely discussed.
This is a leap in semantic search and summarization not a NN that can code.
It seems that OpenAI is trying to make their systems more politically neutral. But completely neutralizing the biases seems elusive. I can imagine that this is a very hard problem to solve since many potential sources of biases in AI systems are outside the control of the engineers creating the models. Think for instance of the overall average political bias present on Internet texts on which AI systems are trained, or pervasive societal biases and blind spots that might manifest in the human raters involved in the reinforcement learning module of the training regime (RLHF). It seems that for the time being, political biases in state of the art AI systems are not going away.
==
I think this should just be acknowledged and as much as possible exposed in the UI rather than the creepy big brother-ness exhibited so far.
I was asking you for yours and I got it.
How old are you by the way?
A few phone calls later and with early access to their product acquired - suffice it to say we were able to generate more ideas of similar caliber than we know what to do with for $0.75 and will be reevaluating our business practices going forward.
I wish you best of luck on your murderous rampage.
The specific operations involve subtracting the integer value from a predetermined constant (0x5f3759df), shifting it right by 1, converting it back to a float, and then performing one iteration of a Newton-Raphson approximation using the threehalfs constant and the original input value. There is also a commented-out line for performing a second iteration, but it is not necessary for most use cases.
So this is actually the perfect counter example to all the other "impressive" ones as this particular explanation can't be derived from a pure reading of the code.It correctly recognized what it was given as the quake inverse square root algorithm and plagiarized bits of the explanation thus sounding l33t!
Still, very useful.