831 karma · joined November 4, 2010
If you know what you're doing, know how to spec a problem space, and can manage the tool competently enough to churn out good results, then everything's fine, and you're maybe being productive or increasing your productivity by some degree. (Professional "Gambler")
If you DON'T know what you're doing, and you're just vibe-coding, then I would argue that it is at least a form of gambling (Amateur "Gambler")
Both of these conditions can also be applied to "hiring people to do a job" however there we can also observe things like reputation, credentials and so on.
"It's just paying to get stuff done..." is, with respect, superflous.
Volcels is way more accurate.
But anyway, good luck in your travels in scratching that itch! :)
blah
#+END_SRC
org-mode to the rescue ;p
usual disclaimers apply! :)
EndeavourOS is apparently Arch-based so I've got no useful suggestions for fixing there, sorry.
I see Wine, YABridge and LinVST mentioned in searches, but while I've got plenty of Linux experience, I'm time-poor and would prefer to make computers make noises rather than spend my time making things work. I have Reaper which is cross-platform but again, getting the VSTs working would be great (at a bare minimum).
A Mac is not an option here. Any pointers gratefully received!
Can't speak to other editors though.. I don't want to sound like I'm trolling, but they generally feel quite clunky, compared to Emacs (ducks, runs ;p )
They honestly do sound quite interesting, and if I could fork myself off a few times to look at fun & interesting things, this GreenArray stuff would be in the list ;)
But I think the win here - these days - for Forth is in things like "running on small embedded devices".. I'm looking with interest at some of the activity around say Arduinos and am thinking that Forth is a rather nice fit for that sort of system. Have bought a kit, and am looking forwards to some non-work quality time to play further :)
(The Books I meantion can be found online very easily, but you'll forgive them for being written back in a time when systems were _simpler_ to grok ;) )
I mean, I feel for the guy moving to a new country - been there, done that - but, with respect he's hyperventilating just a little bit.
The "use once and store" attitude that results in needing safe places for highly radioactive material for 100's of thousands of years is insane, when you can just use the stuff until it's "worn out" and the resulting lower level waste only needs caring for for some small handful of decades.
And we need more fast-breeder reactors, too, FWIW.
If one looks at France, for example, one can see that they have been doing this quite successfully for 30+ years.
It's not a know-how problem, it's a political problem.