748 karma · joined May 13, 2016
In my opinion, I don't see this as undermining the OmniSci commercial offering, but rather opening up GPU accelerated analytics and visualization to a wider audience. A smaller piece of a much larger pie benefits all of the contributors to the RAPIDS project (of which OmniSci is a contributor as well)
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/kafka/apach...
[1] At the time of writing, there were 213 different bike share feeds https://github.com/NABSA/gbfs/blob/master/systems.csv
[1]https://www.domo.com/news/press/domopalooza-2016-to-feature-...
[2] https://www.domo.com/news/press/kesha-joins-the-domopalooza-...
[3] https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/02/15/1349133/0/...
The limitation of 100 million rows is just for 14-day trial purposes; for the paid versions, the lower volumes are quoted as 'Getting Started' prices. For enterprise scale, people can contact MapD to get customized pricing.
As far as the scaling question goes, MapD has a public demo on the website with 11 billion records (and product performance scales somewhat linearly as more GPUs added): https://www.mapd.com/demos/ships/