But you can combine it with an encryption layer yourself by using any of the projects listed here: https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/
1,108 karma · joined June 3, 2015
But you can combine it with an encryption layer yourself by using any of the projects listed here: https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/comparison/
Another way is by connecting to a search engine within the Tor network, like DuckDuckGo's hidden service: https://3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion
Thanks for that, I can now replace `chromium --temp-profile`.
raw_data = [line.split('|', 1) for line in [x.strip() for x in content]]
can be simplified to a single loop: raw_data = [line.strip().split('|', 1) for line in content]
Using str.replace here is also non-idiomatic: plt.title('Top $n Sites Visited'.replace('$n', str(topN)))
How about using str.format instead: plt.title('Top {n} Sites Visited'.format(n=topN)) * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
So it looks like Minix's license does require the copyright/license to be included in distributions.[0]: https://github.com/Stichting-MINIX-Research-Foundation/minix...
Gmail could be as secure as Protonmail by using PGP yourself [1]. And then you can keep your desktop mail client.
Also Google won't need to pay criminals if they're DDOS attacked like Protonmail in the past: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/11/05/proto... (this is when I gave up on Protonmail)
[0]: https://protonmail.com/support/knowledge-base/encrypt-for-ou...
I had the same experience and that's why I made a browser extension that archives pages when you bookmark them. (https://github.com/rahiel/archiveror)
[1]: http://blog.archive.is/post/72136308644/how-much-does-it-cos...
And Debian based distro's like Ubuntu, Tails, and Subgraph also work on AppArmor so choosing AppArmor over SELinux means overall less work for the Debian community.
I thought the creators of snaps/flatpaks would be upstream developers, so they themselves will vote on the package management system by using either. There is no duplication of effort here.
Myself I prefer AppImage [3], because of its simplicity and the fact that they are already supported on all Linux distributions, without installing any explicit support.
[1]: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/flatpak
[2]: https://packages.debian.org/stretch/snapd
[3]: http://appimage.org
DESCRIPTION: AppArmor improves security by limiting the capabilities of programs. Ubuntu has done this years ago [1]. I'd like to see profiles for web browsers enabled by default.
I think AppArmor is the right choice of default Mandatory Access Control for Debian because Ubuntu and security focused Debian derivatives like Tails [2] and SubgraphOS [3] have already committed to it.
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/KnowledgeBase/AppArmorP...
[2]: https://tails.boum.org/contribute/design/application_isolati...
I use these when installing on laptops.
[1]: https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/contrib/completion/gi...
With this release we return to GNU. For just a little while
we dreamt we were tigers. But we are back in the herd,
back to a healthy diet of fresh green free grass.[1]: http://textbooks.opensuny.org/introduction-to-the-modeling-a...