917 karma · joined May 26, 2010
Also:
the ancient artists of surviving ancient art were mostly teenage boys
Sources?
Edit: Anyone care to reply instead of downvoting?
Looking for one good developer to join our team. Great environment (think start-up within a large stable company), truly great small team and outstanding life-work balance/schedule (no overtime, summer hours, etc).
Our stack is: C#, PHP, MySQL, Javascript (plain/JQuery/JQuery Mobile), HTML5, iOS, Android, Selenium. Any combination of those skills is fine.
Full time onsite Minneapolis (Eden Prairie) only, no sponsorship.
Email me at http://i.imgur.com/jg46D.png. I am happy to answer any fellow developers' questions but please, no recruiters. Thanks!
Step 2. Pass them through to adult courts twice as often as white teens.
Step 3. Keep them in prisons 60% longer for the same crimes.
Step 4. Use big words like "confounding variables" to pretend that it's complicated.
Sources:
http://www.iamforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Promise...
http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/black-americans-given...
http://www.iamforkids.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Promise...
In particular, black Florida youth were almost twice as likely to be referred to adult courts as white youth.
I knew about DWB (driving while black) but apparently, LWB (learning while black) is a "thing" too:
http://www.time.com/time/education/article/0,8599,238611,00....
Quote:
A study [...] reports that black students, although they made up just 30% of the population of Miami-Dade County public schools in 2000-01, accounted for half the school arrests in that district.
You to me: Odd. KP said the opposite.
Are you trolling? Let me quote KP:
If she [Adria] didn't proclaim to represent us then it wouldn't be a problem to me.
and
She [Adria] said she is speaking for women in tech.
On what planet are these statements the opposite? I quite literally quoted KP's claims verbatim.
And why did you post that random <blockquote>? Was it supposed to prove that Richards said she was speaking for all women? Because in what you quoted, she doesn't actually say that.
You have made a false claim about what Adria Richards said. If you do not have a quote to back it up, how can I be expected to? How could I possibly find a quote that doesn't exist?
I'm just saying most women in general would be offended to be represented by Adria.
You keep repeating that she represents all women. She doesn't. And you don't know how most women feel based on your own feelings.
You're saying I need to apologize. That shows me you're offended.
I said no such thing. Again, please re-read my post.
Your voice definitely counts too. I just don't understand it (I'm honestly trying).
No, you are not "honestly" trying. You've accused Adria Richards of saying something she didn't, I asked for a quote, and your response was "google it", even though I already said "I've just re-read her tweets and her blog post, and I couldn't find anything". You are also intentionally arguing with things I did not say; implying that I am emotional ("offended") to avoid arguing on substance; and using sarcasm like, "most women are not interested in being made to look stupid" because what, some women like me are? This is not how people maintain an honest and healthy discussion.
She said she is speaking for women in tech.
Quote please? I don't think she said or proclaimed anything of the sort. (I've just re-read her tweets and her blog post, and I couldn't find anything).
I'm speaking for women in tech.
Please stop. You do not speak for me, or any other women in tech. Your opinion is your own.
You're as offended as if I ruined someone's career/life at pycon.
I am not offended at all. Please re-read my post. Which parts did you think said or implied that you've ruined anyone's life or career?
I disagree. She needs to attend to her physical safety, first and foremost, and her mental health, a close second. The overreaction to her tiny tweet was about a million to one and her very public flogging was so out of proportion and so misogynistic and racist that if I were her, I'd be scarred for life. It reminded me of those 3rd world stories that pop up every once in a while where some poor woman gets raped by an entire village as punishment for adultery. Let's not pile up on an already unfortunate situation by suggesting that the perpetrator of a tiny crime (if a rather temperate tweet that called a joke "not cool" can even be called a crime) has to apologize in the wake of other people's much, much larger crimes (from the firing of one of the jokers to rape threats to death threats).
On a larger note, it's never a minority group's responsibility to keep the majority prejudice-free. We really need to dispose of the silly notion that it's our responsibility as women in tech to be 100% perfect lest some men decide to withdraw their respect. We do not deserve to be held to a higher standard than men who engage in irrational, drama llama or otherwise childish behavior all the time (case in point, the dongle joke that started the whole thing).
Our reputation does not need to be "returned" because it was never "lost". Adria Richards, take care of yourself.
P.S. You said, I don't like how she's trying to speak for me and want her to apologize. Do you not see that she was not trying to speak for you any more than you tried to speak for me just now? That being born a woman does not make you the speaker for, or responsible for the reputation of, your entire gender? Otherwise you have exact same thing to apologize for.
To give a specific example, I've always thought that community involvement is one of those developmental stages that happen later in life. Bill Gates is a great example: obviously a "leader in business, innovation and politics", who went from active, principled disdain towards all charity when he was younger to the world's biggest philanthropist today. Whenever I see community involvement coming from a high schooler, I always "blame" parents, college admission coaches, church, etc.
Similarly, serious commitment to more than one sport makes me think "ambitious parents" and "affluent" rather than "drive". I just don't buy that a high-schooler, all by him/herself, has the wherewithal to manage multiple athletic training programs. I did serious ballet before I went to college, and let's face it, while I did all the sweating, my mother gets more than half the credit.
Students paid the printing costs (or, on students' behalf: their parents, taxpayers, or private donors).
Is that better? I tried to use shorter sentences.
Also, when you say "used to routinely", you are projecting. The press made it into a banner issue, but really, think about it. "Uptown" used to be very, very poor, and poor people don't take cabs.
There is this notion that cabbies are discriminating against the downtrodden, but in reality, they are the downtrodden. They are low-income, immigrant people who, unlike you, actually live in those outer boroughs. People who need money so badly that they will drive a cab for a living.
You, on the other hand, are a wealthy dude. A dude with so much disposable income that you can throw $20-$40 at a cab instead of taking the subway for free. (Free as in, you already have an unlimited metro card, yes? And $20-$40 is just one way, yes? And you do this every weekend, yes?).
So you, the wealthy dude, have the law on your side. Apparently, your need for low-cost on-demand, luxury transportation trumps the basic human right to free will. Apparently, mostly white, wealthy people need to be protected from being discriminated against by mostly brown, poor people. Apparently, when a laborer refuses to take on dangerous work or insufficiently compensated work ^, we must bring in the government guns and show him who's boss.
(^) It's always money or personal safety. Discrimination has nothing to do with it and I find it rather humorous that cab takers project their own racist attitudes onto cab drivers, seeing as I don't recall a while cabbie once during my 15 years in NYC.
So this mysterious word of yours.... what is it?
Mine is "privilege blindness": http://www.shakesville.com/2008/04/blindness-of-privilege.ht...
Looking for one good developer to join our team. Great environment (think start-up within a large stable company), truly great small team and outstanding life-work balance/schedule (no overtime, summer hours, etc).
Our stack is: C#, PHP, MySQL, Javascript (plain/JQuery/JQuery Mobile), HTML5, iOS, Android, Selenium. Any combination of those skills is fine.
Full time onsite Minneapolis (Eden Prairie) only, no sponsorship.
Email me at http://i.imgur.com/jg46D.png. I am happy to answer any fellow developers' questions but please, no recruiters. Thanks!
Absolutely not true. There is no shortage of male actors and models. Whatsoever. And the prettier they are, the bigger the pay delta vis-a-vis the female actors and models. Whoever is hiring booth babes is actively excluding men, and paying through the nose to do it.
Those 3 things are broken as well. Lost all my data twice.
FYI, kids grow up just fine in culturally and ethnically homogeneous environments. There is a world outside the United States or wherever you happen to be from. There are very large countries out there made up entirely of one ethnicity and one culture, and not everyone in those countries is devoid of empathy.
I replied to your baseless assertions that kids need male role models and both genders for their development: "in the absence of a father figure kids will look for role models [several examples of male role models]", "you don't want a homogeneous environment". My links show research that specifically says this is not true. The author of the article goes to great lengths to say it's not true. Do you have any facts or personal experiences that say otherwise?
(If by "uncle" and "Clint Eastwood next door" you didn't mean a male role model, and by "homogeneous environment" you didn't mean gender-homogeneous, then what did you mean)?