42 karma · joined December 21, 2013
And discovering Chromium-Updater the other day has plugged the only missing piece in the jigsaw, for me.
[1]http://chromium.woolyss.com/ [2]https://github.com/benbristow/Chromium-Updater/releases
When more discerning people around me criticise it, I send them off to read: http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/im-comic-sans-asshole
Thanks for the refresh, OP. I can't wait to see where I can sneak this in.
I've run a few campaigns and always managed to break even. I believe the key to success is very selective, and often slightly obscure, targeting.
I think this statement is the biggest problem with the article. I can't reasonably see how the innovators within Apple would be too bothered by what the legal team are up to.
There's nothing special about an rsync/ssh solution that precludes the backup server from creating a read-only copy of each and any backup.
One of which is Google+, every cloud has a silver lining.
<html>
<body>
<script>
setTimeout(function() {
var page = ["http://bluestatedigital.com",
"http://microsoft.com",
"http://ngpvan.com",
"http://mongodb.com",
"http://comcast.com",
"http://scientology.org",
"http://timewarnercable.com",
"http://godaddy.com",
"http://loggly.com",
"http://php.net",
"http://eclipse.org",
"http://intuit.com",
"http://mysql.com"];
window.location = page[Math.floor(Math.random()*page.length)];
}, 1500);
</script>
</body>
</html>
Any good ideas for compressing the array? At the expense of legibility, obviously.http://www.rocknrollbride.com/2012/04/how-to-write-a-press-r...
(Disclosure: although involved in rocknrollbride.com, I didn't write the article)