266 karma · joined May 27, 2025
keyboard arrow up x2, arrow down x2, left, right, left, right, enter
I should verify with wireshark and other software that my LG TV isn't listening to me and selling my data.
I should make sure that whatever product I buy I spend the time to go over every setting page in case there is a switch (defaulted on) that says "I authorize the sell of my data".
I should make sure to look at every ingredients on the back of each box of food product to make sure it will not kill me.
I should document myself on the undisclosed growing practices (because no packaging here) of the vegetables and fruit I am buying and make sure that I equal PhD researchers on the dangers of the pesticides used by the specific company I am buying from.
I should make sure myself that the battery in any device is up to standard and will not blow me and my living place by researching the factory that made it and buying testing equipment.
I should make sure to educate myself on how my retirement 401k investment strategy works otherwise, I may not have proper retirement.
... I could go on and on; it's infinite.
Or at least: tell me I should be careful/worry about those particular things.
> the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.”
So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading. Which to me while not being astrology, isn't much better.
And by saying that, I am not saying that they absolutely couldn't do anything about the stolen credentials, but still, they don't seem to really be the issue in the story.
It just seems like a PR post and it makes their solution at the same time looks good for taking accountability (if we don't wonder "accountability on what?") but at the same time they appear as security failing, which they aren't. That's very odd to me.
Wealth isn't with boomers: it is with rich boomers, pointing the high mortgage and debt that a lot of boomers have.
And they explain that the wealth is going to stay and be kept by these rich families (which will invest and not spend).
But I'm not at all an expert in the domain and I might have misunderstood something please feel free to contradict me!
Money? It's hard to stop getting revenue suddenly for an undetermined time. Especially with a family behind.
> Worst case scenario, you fail, learned a bunch, lean back on what supported you before
That's to my opinion very simplistic very often not true and dependent on the job market (which isn't that great right now!)
> Lorenz has been the subject of online harassment, which multiple sources have described as coordinated or orchestrated.
> Much of the harassment has originated from right-wing online spaces.
> The Independent wrote, "Lorenz is a regular target of attacks from the right online, with comments she makes frequently blowing up and feeding an arguably disingenuous outrage culture, so much so that she has been called 'the most harassed technology journalist in America' and her career recommended for study to fellow reporters".
It's not because a model performs better in some applications (often by fine-tuning to get better scores at specific tests) that it is better across the board or that we have to believe the company releasing the model with a high number 3 > 2 so that it is commonly accepted as better.
Pushing the reasonnning further: f you need an Opus level performance then not accepting GPT 3 isn't a smell.
Calling 911 does not give you an in-network and there no way to know in advance unless calling your insurance (in business hours, giving that you are not dying... which you probably are)
Gosh this is ridiculous
Also RAM is impacting other components such as SSD
The US has dedicated visas for running your own company in normal circumstances. I am not sure what you mean.