60 karma · joined February 13, 2014
Drawing from my roots the Canada Wheat board was always surrounded by heated arguments and controversal decisions. There was the UN wheat scandal but that is more a matter of if you believe they are evil and not their level of incompetancy. They received a significant amount of name calling due to their decisions and policies, but I can't recall any significant missteps in their application of the policies they set out to act upon.
While I don't agree with this approach I can see why it happens. For example I have a smattering of news articles to prove incompetency. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nwt-health-data-breach-... https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/forget-spy-case-where-s-brief... and a bunch of professionals in what amount to a twitter war.
If the Canadian government doesn't want people talking negatively about them then there needs to be more transparency. Not to the level of risking a breach, but something along the lines of a list of safeguards they are implementing. I wouldn't ever consider one safeguard a solution. If somebody feels the need to call out where the information is, I would legitimately like to read it.
No, you really shouldn't. Every bad thing can happen unless you protect against it, but being paranoid isn't helpful for this industry.
This was going to happen eventually. If they didn't want this to happen then the funding would be there to have this system built up with triple redundancy (or possibly 7 times, maybe they have triple). We all do the best with the funding we have. The good thing about this is that they assessed the problem and they had remediations for it. They announced it publicly (using several methods) and they have an alternative line.
I have been enrolled in the crypto2 class for several years now. I hope they finally offer the course, but I have low hopes.
Why would I assume that Concurrent runs == Seperate Runs or that other caching mechanisms aren't in place or really anything. Computers do really odd things trying to optimize and making assumptions that your system is the same over a period of 30 minutes when you don't even know it is the same 30 minutes is concurrent. There is all sorts of stuff that gets in the way of performance tests and I would like to know how it is mitigated. Again, I am sure there is proper process, but why wouldn't know want to know what that is?
It isn't that I am doubting the results, but without some trail on how to get the results I can't make this useful information. For example if I were architecting a system and was using this as information I have no idea if I run this in a VM that I need enough memory to get these results.
Also from a more serious stance the danger is the malware vector or the destruction of the ability to have integrity and not the data in the torrent itself.
Or another weird to put it, your application must be IPV6 with the option of a IPV4 add-on.
I know there is an argument for making this more readable, but if you are at the level of fixing blue screens chances are you can use a search engine.
Also, I am thrilled about news being at 11 again.
Did you friend benefit from this experience? In fairness it could have freed up time for team sports or community service.
I will also mention that some people have boundary issues due to various conditions and a employer/employee relationship can not support a healthy recovery. Similar to how some psychiatrists don't take their patients out socially.
I mention all this as I hope that it makes it your choice to not share and not a onus to stay perfect all the time.