I feel articles like this should recommend an annual income threshold, if you are buying these lattes with a credit card while your checking account is over-drafted then it is going to indirectly affect your retirement. But I do acknowledge that most people reading this are probably not in an over-drafted position.
This is the most important point. Networks are created mostly, not only born into. Success recognizes skill, by developing a skill then ASKING to work for successful organizations(big and small) the network grows naturally.
I periodically smoke, yet I don't call myself a smoker. Yet when I buy insurance I buy the smokers plan, the idea being that if I do need to use the insurance I expect the Insurance company to use any information necessary to deny my claim. Should I be worried about this?
We just assume that when we commit, the code has been tested in the local dev environment. Better not be committing untested code to my repos, that will get you reprimanded.
Same here. Without staging how do I change 10 files but only commit 3 of them? For example working on a change, then notice a bug that should be fixed now. Currently I just stage the 3 files for the hot bug fix, commit those, deploy, then continue working on the remaining 7 files.
It's probably not a download it and run it piece of software, there are probably lots of configurations and likely requires the user to provide their own models and trading rules.
"It reportedly has an area the size of two-thirds of a Manhattan and, it as tall as a ten story building, at 1000 feet." - I don't understand this sentence.
"...everything works great despite the occasional check engine light..." that may make you feel better but it's not true. The life and efficiency of your engine is being reduced. What year, make, model are you driving? When you sell it do you plan on telling the next owner that you drove it religiously with the check engine light on?
This entire thread is great, 10 data scientists all want their own special chart to be the best. You are all wrong, you should have a view of all these charts!!!! hahaha
If you redefine terrorism to remove the dependence on violence, unless I missed something in the article? I don't personally believe that trying to find security flaws terrorism.
They probably needed the data collected by the current hardware in order to consider developing the next generation. Then they needed the hardware in order to develop the software. The only way to get the data is from a real fleet running hardware and software you control.
Can I enter your factory and inspect the dies as they come off the line before they are sealed? If yes, then you could indeed verify the silicon is as designed. Probably just as you could take a chip that does not work and diagnose the problem, this functionality would seem to be necessary to successfully build a chip/chip factory in the first place. How would you troubleshoot the manufacturing process if you couldn't audit the product for quality/accuracy?
But more importantly, if I build the product and get the first customer what do I need you for? 2k is chicken shit. Unless the idea is a throwaway, something I'm not passionate about, I'd just build it myself.
Maybe not hurt if it was not dilutable, the initial 20% holder could be issued more shares to keep their percentage at 20%. By the time 3 or 4 rounds are raised the initial 80% owner might only retain 20% after dilution. So in the end you have to look at the cap table after future rounds, the fact that during a period of history (probably before there is any real cash to distribute) the split was 80/20 won't matter.
If this is truly for assembly line diagnostics they should add a hardware self destruct to the interlink with those circuits, after VISA serves the intended purpose fry it. Is that a reasonable and technically feasible option?
I did not say the swerve was safe, I said that a even safe driver (driver who drives defensively) driver might have to swerve. Any unplanned reactionary movement of the steering is of course not safe. Seems like you misread what I typed, or maybe you're a natural gaslighter?
Just getting back to follow up on my question now, and I have to agree, this was very thoughtful. If hacker news had the equivalent of reddit gold I would give you some.
Accidents happen, just because you find yourself in a situation that requires you to swerve does not mean you were driving unsafe. Why does swerving imply the driver is unsafe? Surely you can imagine a safe driver having to swerve in some situations, right?