There still seems to be a lot of issues with lsp/pyright, and might contribute to why grep at least gives a more stable and predictable performance (https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues?q=is%3Aissu...)
65 karma · joined January 25, 2018
There still seems to be a lot of issues with lsp/pyright, and might contribute to why grep at least gives a more stable and predictable performance (https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues?q=is%3Aissu...)
It does not seem like the authors made even the slightest effort to control for any confounds.
>> To ensure brakes remain responsive in cold and wet weather, Model 3 is equipped with brake disc wiping. When cold and wet weather is detected, this feature repeatedly applies an imperceptible amount of brake force to remove water from the surface of the brake discs.
Having owned model Ys made in both China and Germany, I can tell you that the germans have not succeeded. The made in China Y was 100% no issues, while the German one looks like it has been in a collision already. Anecdotal, but this seems to be the pattern with cars delivered to Europe.
They did, kind of. The factor "waketime to breakfast" [Fig 3] has a beta of .14, which is by far the strongest modifiable factor. This may suggest that not eating breakfast at all may be even better than eating a bowl of sugar.
I really do not understand how the authors fail to even mention this result in the paper.
How did the authors get away with not even mentioning the strongest modifiable predictor of alertness in their study? I cannot comprehend this.
Otherwise GREAT study.
What is the reason for that? Do the players only trust hard physical paper numbers?
Btw, the euro jackpot is about €120m, but still far from profitable.
> Sent from my Tesla on autopilot
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190410IP...
The European Transport Safety Council (ETSC), the body which supports the introduction of ISAs, says the limiters would reduce collisions by 30%, and save around 25,000 lives within 15 years.
I think this is a really brave move by the EU, and a great example of use of technology to save human lives. I wonder if these kinds of "unpopular" legislations are rarely be made by local governments filled with politicians up for re-election every four years as it spells doom for chances re-election.
1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190410IP...
2. https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/mandatory-spe...
> but all participants were included for statistical analysis of the primary outcome (intention-to-treat approach).
I think this study looks rather solid.
Maybe Google IO will bring more news.
$ docker run -it --rm -p 8888:8888 jupyter/datascience-notebook
At baseline, they performed an extensive neuropsychologist test battery, including a bunch of subtests:
-Trail Making Test A
-WAIS-III Digit Symbol Substitution
-WAIS-III Block Design Test
-Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (copy)
-Trail Making Test B
-Stroop Interference
-F.A.S.
-Buschke-Fuld Selective Reminding Test [SRT]
-Wechsler Memory Scale-3rd Edition [WMS-III]
-Verbal Paired Associations I
-Benton Visual Retention Test
-Buschke-Fuld SRT
-Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test [recall]
-WMS-III Verbal Paired Associations II
-Boston Naming Test
-Animal Naming Test
The outcome measures they report are: -TMT-A
-SRT
-BVMT-R
I would be _very_ surprised if those were the only tests they performed at followup after a 18 month (expensive) clinical trial. If these measures had been specified as the only outcome measures of interest, noone would question the results. But, when it was not registered, and when no other measures are reported, not even in the supplementary, the reader is left to wonder why that is.