909 karma · joined January 13, 2020
That does not, however, excuse anyone from following the law.
I could be wrong, but the intent of the law is to encourage companies to train candidates to make them ready for the job. If you are just bringing in workers from other countries to work on us soil, even though there are us workers that can you do the job, in my mind you are essentially circumventing the intent of the law. This weakens the country for everyone.
Part of the problem right now with regards to skills is that there is essentially a threshold that has been crossed for outsourcing where the skills are just more prevalent in other countries. That's obviously not a great look for the United States.
It’s only logical that if you operate in the U.S. you follow basic U.S. laws.
I have sympathy for the workers. In reality it is the immmigration attorneys or other members of the company who need to be sanctioned.
Regardless I am glad the workers get to go home. If it is illegal I’d imagine the company should be at fault.
America is a very large country and I’m sure if you paid enough, and took the time to train the workers you can find people to do the work. If you have planned your budget and timeline around not taking this path then it seems unethical to me.
I’ve witnessed tech jobs done where there are plenty of capable people in the us available to do the work. They just cannot afford to post us wages and train the workers in the us.
I completely understand that some projects are different, and you need a specific skillset. But if you are going to do work on us soil you have to follow the law.
I totally understand that it is universally abused. I’ve seen it abused in white collar work. Companies need to adjust economically and plan their budgets accordingly.
Honestly, in many parts of the country there is no hope, no jobs, and just drugs. It’s time to invest in the U.S. citizen again.
I’m happy there is a crackdown because I have seen U.S. jobs lost due to this behavior. It’s actually the only reason I voted for trump.
It does not matter who is funding you.
I could be wrong though. I have personally seen companies abuse this. I’m glad it’s be cracked down on.
I’ve pivoted to architecture and higher level problem solving to continue my growth.
I have also found I do my best work when I’m happy. It’s important that the tool works for me and I don’t work for the tool.
It helps with getting the mouse and keyboard down.
It inevitably brings us many benefits, but it does feel like the U.S. and other western countries are being hollowed out.
Maybe this is more of cost disease than dollar dominance. Maybe they are related in some ways?
I see what you are getting at though.
The truth is that micro services are a tool. However your organization has broadly agreed to utilize the tool is the correct approach.