909 karma · joined January 13, 2020
When autonomous weapons are deployed the scale will be too large and no one can be held accountable to prosecute like Nuremberg.
Personally I have my own opinions here about moral obligations but it is best to keep those to myself.
I would like to see restricted access to only us workers for us citizens data though.
Transferring us customer data outside the country should be illegal
If these proofs are so important why is there not a central repositories of the proposal in a formalized language ?
For the record I feel like I dm in your position also.
Also, it lays the groundwork to absolutely crush dissent in the future .
For somethings I think they are legally obligated to do this. It is creepy.
You have to call a spade a spade — the profession accepts this sort of tradeoff in the name of speed and cost.
A well designed system would have never allowed those mistakes to occur. I feel like using an llm to catch these sorts of things is just because it wasn’t built right in the first place.
I think ai systems will be able to build systems of abstraction that are formally verified, and we won’t be needed(eventually).
Right now it’s being used as a bandaid.
The software has to be built better.
I can’t imagine this would be any different — banning open weight models would hurt us in the long run. The point is to beat the competition, not suppress it.
There should be no limits on open or custom models. Too often safety is a synonym for surveillance and control. It’s a natural consequence, intended or not.
I am curious… why can’t distillation be stopped?
As a side not Im not against protectionism, but it has to be across the board and the same in all industries with no excrptions. We’ve let all these industries die on the vine due to cheap cost in foreign countries. It could very well happen to ai.
It’s incredible how overblown these sorts of things can become
It’s a disconcerting future.
Is it cost ?
It’s simple and easy to follow. At scale use multi tenancy.