206 karma · joined September 28, 2010
The project might be doomed to fail but there will be individual tasks that can be completed successfully. Complete these tasks (and your tasks) and present them as your contributions to the win/progress column. If you are one of the few engineers who is getting stuff done, you will be noticed in positive light and it will be harder to throw you under the bus.
you cannot stop the inevitable failure of a project, but no where does it say you have to walk towards it. Complete your tasks and just a little more. publicize your minor achievements, and stay out of the politics. this way you can do what is right and remain unscathed when all falls down. Good luck.
"trotting out tired justifications nobody asked for maybe you're just using any excuse"
I never asked you to respond to my comment, but you still did! I am part of the discussion , the same way you are. and to take a step back and think why things are the way they are, IMO is very good thing. billions of app downloads happen for a reason. I was not justifying the the practice. in fact i did say "I personally think, having a small, disappearing toolbar to remind the user an app is available is the best way to go"
there are enough apps to draw an example for every case discussed (good mobile app, bad thick client vice versa..)
a) linked in does b)fb, the app is way better than the mobile website c) I agreed with this. "yes, it can be extremely annoying at times when companies prompt you to download their app" d) this is jsut hyperbole and i have nothing to say to this.
I agreed with the poster too. I had trouble with his tone like many others. with app downloads not slowing down, it is important to understand why things are the way they are. this might also help to predict the winning strategy.
and it is not just big firms that prefer an app over a website. piggy backing on my previous example, a search for stocks brings up an entirely different list of services in the apple App Store than google. the mechanisms in play are different when it comes to mobile apps. As a coder, i prefer rich mobile websites to app's whenever possible. But, I am unsure about the trend ( as it seems many business are..) and that is a discussion I look forward to have.
As to the point in discussion: yes, it can be extremely annoying at times when companies prompt you to download their app. they have good reasons to do it too.
a) you spend good money to build an app, you want to drive users to the app instead of the site
b) many times , the app can be more functional than the site
c) one of the harder things for companies to do , is to retain user engagement. ex, if you have a firm that delivers stock quotes for users, you want to modify the users behavior to use your firm instead of a yahoo finance, or google. by making the user commit to download your app , in a way you get the users commitment to use your service.
d) you get a piece of users mental space , when you get their phone's screen space.
I personally think, having a small, disappearing toolbar to remind the user an app is available is the best way to go. Since every business with a website, also trying to get a mobile presence, a dual strategy of mobile web and app, seems to be the norm.
p.s I usually upvote the stories that I find interesting enough to comment. I choose not to do it this time.
edit:p.s
Drug companies use poor as guinea pigs , marking up the price for wealthy nations and worst of all , prevent life saving care for billions of people. some on whom the drugs were tested on. So, there is more than one reason this victory is sweet for the developing nations.
p.s sorry about the multiple edits..
I think at some level, you need to believe not all doctors wear white coats. modern medicine is a few hundered years old , but people have been getting sick and have been treated since the dawn of time. When a country sets up regulatory agencies ( http://www.ccimindia.org ) , qualifies practitioners and monitors the practice ( albeit poorly) , to dismiss the structure based on wikipedia articles is incorrect to say the least. if only conclusive evidence , agreed upon by everyone is acceptable we should have stopped taking aspirin a long time ago:) http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/950817/aspirin.shtml