GitHub made documentation more consistent how? GitHub issues were more transparent how? A PR answered a question I would have asked Stack Overflow never I think.
6,845 karma · joined July 15, 2015
GitHub made documentation more consistent how? GitHub issues were more transparent how? A PR answered a question I would have asked Stack Overflow never I think.
They said git-annex supports git back to 2.22. Not git after 2.22 was dropped.
An incompatible change in ghc would break compilation of other software also.
Federal juror pay is $50 daily.[1] This would be 8 hours or less of minimum wage.[2] States pay from $0 to $50 seemingly.[3]
8 states and 1 district had any employer jury pay law. All other than Nebraska excluded small employers, excluded part time employees, allowed to pay under minimum wage, allowed to pay nothing after 5 days or less, or allowed to force employees to use paid time off.[4]
[1] https://www.uscourts.gov/court-programs/jury-service/juror-p...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_in_the_United_Sta...
[3] https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/jury-duty-p...
How would it choose from 2 home partitions on other disks?
It was in many cases. But there is a federal law for this now.[1]
Not more consistently than other parties.
[1] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bezos-water-consumption-ai...
Linux Foundation are a business league. Many Linux maintainers work for Linux Foundation members.
And governments investigated high electricity users as suspected marijuana growers. Would governments ignore high identifier use?
You don't?
> Instead we cheer for LLM companies who made it an order of magnitude worse.
You do?
> Let's be honest, the only time we care about being tracked is to access porn, for some reason.
You do?
> And if we're being honest, we are already tracked when doing it.
You are?
They said There are proposed mitigations like issuing multiple sets of credentials or rotating them, but we're not going to get an infinite number of keypairs for every website or session in the secure enclave in practice.
> Basically, the wallet requests a batch of single-use eIDs that all use different device key-pairs.
The comments you replied to omitted mass surveillance. But the article and 1st comment included it. The government would know what wallet requested each single use identifier.
This could be true. But I saw it in histories of not controversial pages also. Some people feel they own articles they contributed to. Wikipedia made a policy against this because it was a problem.[1]
> You notice they almost never actually link to the reverts they are complaining about.
I noticed they said it was years before nearly always if they said when. And to find revisions of forgotten date in Wikipedia required more time than most people would spend for a comment. And anecdotal evidence changed beliefs rarely.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ownership_of_content