So an office full of people with VR headsets on? I don't see the incentive in that compared to doing it from home.
640 karma · joined February 22, 2017
So an office full of people with VR headsets on? I don't see the incentive in that compared to doing it from home.
Hello from FlightAware! We are hiring for a number of positions including: software test engineer, network reliability engineer, and software engineer. Our team is headquartered in Houston, Texas, but we work as a distributed team and accept remote applicants for work within the United States.
FlightAware has built the world’s leading aviation software platform, processing over 180 million incoming messages an hour from over 30,000 feeds -- over 2TB a day and growing -- to provide the best, most complete, and most accurate real-time flight tracking services in the industry. We use Python, Rust, C++, Tcl, and JavaScript. We are proud to have built a wide variety of successful products on this foundation that have become central to the aviation industry at large.
He clearly spends a lot of time building high quality small-scale versions of things to show how they work, but more often than not he just shows those things while the voiceover isn't actually talking about what's being shown. Or when he is talking about the thing being shown, it's a very brief comment and then he moves on.
I love his videos, but I very often finish them and think "I could have learned more if he spent some more time explaining in detail what's happening with the model, and replaying some component of it several times over as he explains it in more detail."
Of course, people can look at the fine-print and determine where it was made. But that's a lot less obvious than the silk screened badge not being there.
>if you're from IT — well, it would be like learning the alphabet once again. Probably you won't find anything new; if you do, that is a bad sign for your employer.
But after seeing a few other positive comments about it I decided to go back and give it a read, and I'm so glad I did. Great article.
Teams on the other hand... that's a hog.
https://www.academia.edu/36044237/WhatsApp_Encryption_Overvi...
> Extreme nightcap in the #network frequency. Quite unusual at this height and at this point in time. One of my measuring devices even shows 49.74Hz as a minimum. Has a major #power plant failed somewhere?
And second tweet:
>Here is another representation of the # mains frequency from just now. Extremely unusual, as a malfunction is to be suspected. Unfortunately, none of my network analyzers are currently running to check the exact course.
My name is Maxim and I'm an independent game developer.
With millions of downloads it is definitely my most successful game so far, and that's thanks to a very active fan base which I'm very grateful to have.
It's really cool to see people play the game in front of your eyes.
You evaluate behavior - are they passionate gamers? Or rather cold business people.
You check out their game - it looks like a copy of a popular game you know.
The answer So as with many other people who offered to buy the game - you politely decline.
How come? How come a copycat can use the name of the original game? You guessed it... trademarks.
I suppose if the actual source file changes then the page would be updated as well which is neat, but if you're specifying certain lines to read from then that could easily become a problem.
Considering how few shortcodes you're using I just felt like there must be a good reason to use it in this way and I was curious why.
PRICING: WHY PAY FOR WHAT YOU DON’T USE?
PAY FOR THE COMPUTE AND STORAGE YOU ACTUALLY USE.
I found that pretty funny given the problem you're running in to.
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/145633
>Also answers by the zlib guy
https://stackoverflow.com/a/20765054
https://stackoverflow.com/users/1180620/mark-adler
>the nagle algorithm guy
You're very right, that's a better way to phrase it.
>Glad I found it on here
I completely agree. I feel like it could be a great catalyst to a lot of good conversation which is why I was ultimately glad it was on here and that I read it, even though at first I found it strange. It made me feel a way that I can't exactly explain or put it in to words; and I consider that to be a good thing.
The problem with your second example, targeting a specific user, is that they're doing this without any kind of warrant.
"VoIPBL is a distributed VoIP blacklist that is aimed to protects against VoIP Fraud and minimizing abuse for network that have publicly accessible PBX's"
It's very similar to what you linked but is targeted to catching VoIP abuse.
This is all speculation based on my experiences with USPS.
Edit: Working as expected now but I grabbed a screenshot if you want it for any reason. Not that it would be much help now.