22,046 karma · joined May 17, 2013
prepend.at.hn
Anyone putting long form stuff into an IM system is taking the way of pain.
Detail in the email, expect people to read it or fail. And include a reference to a wiki or some more detailed version that can be collaborated on and extended.
So the email isn’t the primary source, the wiki is (really some markdown in git). But the email is the thing that people organize and find over time.
I’ve heard this “conclusion” from many people over my career. I disagree as a general rule as much of my work is scientific and technical and long replies are more useful than talking as having things written down makes things reproducible and shareable.
I think long emails are bad ways to deliberate or debate or to collaboratively create. But they are great for communicating complex ideas to variable size audiences (ie, one person forwards to their team or files things off for later reference). Even better when accompanied to a link to a web version that can be revised with additional info later.
This really helps due to the async nature. Getting on the phone with someone and talking through an idea with them assumes both parties have time to do that. And is a silly suggestion when 5 people need to read something.
I find it more efficient to get a thoughtfully crafted email than a phone call that still will need to be followed up with an email to confirm all parties understand.
My, probably wrong, take is that the “talk, don’t write” people is based on their inability to logically think through, structure, and communicate their ideas and, instead, would rather connect directly and hope the solution emerges from a conversation.
When it comes to funny or successful female comedians, I don’t think Amy Shumer would be in the top 7.
Also, maybe you’re hitting an equity filter that purposely doesn’t compare race, sex, weight, etc. Recently chatgpt said it couldn’t estimate the race and age of a person in a photo because it would violate ethical norms. The photo was of me and then I tried again with a friend of mine.
Or exploited some addiction.
Maybe hurricane care insurance would have a high CTR even though it sucks. Maybe impulse purchases would have high CTR.
People choose to do lots of anti-user things (eg, sugar sodas and diabetes, cigarettes, 9 year car loans at 14%, etc). Enabling bad things is a bad thing.
Maybe if I searched “rav4 vs”
Cynically, this seems like the blargh Google says about how ads make our lives better. I think that’s BS and think ads are noise I have to push through to do whatever I’m trying to do.
Develop demand outside of amazon and people will deep link and google into your product page.
Amazon search sucks and if your product is good you don’t need it.
When you join a company, you typically sign an agreement that talks about how the company owns all your output. Thumbs upping a Teams message is work output and they own it.
Every email sent and received. Every keystroke. Etc etc etc.
If you don’t want your employer to log and sell it, start your own company. Or use a personal device. I do the latter.
There’s people at work whose messages get completely ignored after too many times of posting verbose, useless, ai slop.
It’s extremely rare that someone smart with something smart to say produces this crap.
Like someone said upthread if the author isn’t willing to spend time writing cogently then I don’t think it’s worth my time to try to parse it.
So it really is just a reflection of your proclivities than anything societal.
I don’t know if this is true. I’m fairly certain that all cultures have prostitutes. And porn is more a function of technology and income rather than geography. Lots of exploitation of women in Asia, Africa, and other non-Western cultures.
Of course, this is something that all culture need to work on improving. But understanding reality is a big step to stopping or reducing this objectification.
Just years in prison, it’s not about restoration, it’s about punishment.
There’s a definition independent from 1st/2nd/3rd world [0] and the US’ income seems to clearly make it developed.
Patreon is profitable. He doesn’t have to fire anyone to continue operations. He just wants more money.
If he cared about them as beautiful people, he wouldn’t fire them.
It’s one thing if you’re bleeding cash and have to cut. Another when you discover a cheaper way to do things and don’t want to retrain and grow in new ways where you’d need people.
Patreon CEO is full of horse apples.
My current car shows this once per driver. I always thought toyota engineers were stupid for designing such a system.