posterboy

on firefox

assuming the guard node connects to the host when the host communicates with the client, this makes a little more sense. If I understand correctly you are saying that they did not seize a boat load of unrelated nodes and have rather fluxcompensated it with "timing correlation" and infinite funds.

Ad hominem: your username spells out MIB, Men in Black, surely you are joking.

technicly this is the only comment in this chain that is relevant to the featured article, but it's technicly so incomplete that it's almost wrong, I can tell from having read the thread and knowing next to nothing else about how TOR works.

They don't have plausible evidence to subpoena the guard node if a middle node only sees encrypted traffic. They would also need to control the exit nodes which communicate with the target's host or they simply control the host as a honeypot.

you forgot to mention it should fit under a thumbnail, probably

sounds like a spherical cow on a frictionless plane.

You are missing that to drive one-self home is a metaphor, possibly a visual metaphor in this case, for DIY self-service in the private domain, as it were.

there are no good examples. The basic premise in Linguistics these days seems tl be that all languages are potentially equally expressive. Trade-offs in one domain (grammar, lexicon, phonology etc.) afford advantages in another. Which means, there is no need to refer to Japanese at all.

You could equally refer to some slur in a lower register to then claim that this doesn't exist in your language and how it can't be translated either. So when Joe Biden said "SoB" on tape once, that was code switching; likewise, when Trump says anything it's all made up and coded and means something entirely different. However, these are bad examples if your target is a monolingual Japanese, obv.

However, Tsundoku hasn't caught on, at least not in English, except as a vain example of language fun facts. If there was a need, it would be borrowed eventually, perhaps as a semantic loan (calque). We call it hording already. Japanese simply adds a work related to reading. I don't read Japanese but I can recognize the "speech" radical at least.

The characters aren't connected so the brush is lifted and a space left behind. Of course this also goes for the space between signs of a compound word, but this also holds for "compound word", which is itself a compound word. Also they had \n = EoL alright.

Negative spaces are so important in *-graphy

we are opperating in a "breadboard"?

Related to what, Frikandel?

gnash (one's teeth) and German knusen ("to chew") ought to be related with nosh and German naschen, seeing that snack in the same sense may be derived from some onomatopoeia meaning "bite". It's a non-trivial problem since these onmnomnom forms are thought to escape regular sound change. However, you may be right that silent g is inserted by mistake, but an archaic g-prefix which may be realized as /k/ is productive in Swabian, which might indicate a western Yiddish variety rather than the more eastern Ashkenaz.

the invisible microbes of the appendix are shaping the reservoir effects for a reason

what is "this"?

Oh the frequency illusion. I read just today about a possible value of one sign. That's in Adams and Mallory's Encyclopedia from 1997!

You misunderstand the problem. There's an 80 page article concerned with the spelling of one word and its inflections.

The typical solution would be to squint at it and write down the classical Greek form. That would be roughly equivalent to me talking English in Holland because I'm shy of Dutch, as a German native.

Title could be read as exposing by means of an app dedicated to exposing said credentials. Hackernews suggests something else, but hasn't really outlined the expose-action.

The text of the decision should be paramount.

This deserves further commentary.

In my humble opinion, what really grinds my gears is the abuse of the letter of the law, “circumventing the access protection”. If your fence has gaping holes, it's not a functional fence.

Since this is hackernews, graffiti "vandalism" is still a good example. The only protection of public facing walls is law enforcement, which is spotty. Private property such as trains may employ fences and security, which can be circumvented. Train stations and trains in service have to open anyhow. Terms of Service may explicitly forbid pollution, defacement, however you want to call it (this holds by analogy if you leave logs on the server, my point being, as it were, that security is a process).

The law makes a practical difference for each of these cases, but the spirit of the law is the same in each case and the baseline is that the law is whatever is deemed appropriate by the powers that be, the finder of facts, population as represented by select individuals, the common joe. This, in turn, is supposed to be enshrined in constitutions of sorts. In sum, “unlawful" (“widerrechtlich” or “unbefugt”) derives in different ways from constitutional rights.

In the given case, subsection 202a is based on confidentiality (Art. 10 GG "privacy of correspondance"), but in my example (guilty as charged) the laws against vandalism are based on property (Art. 14 GG). In result, your comparison is a type error for me (as is circumvent if access control is a process).

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/index.html

Comparative Law is a real thing, by the way, that is most foreign to me, but I make due.

It's rather different. Some time I saw my neighbour left the key sticking outside. Doesn't feel like an invitation to me. Also, garden doors aren't necessarily locked and I think this is difficult to legislate.

German law applies to TFA so compare Hausfriedensbruch (criminal code): the adverbs of choice are "widerrechtlich" like undefined behaviour; "ohne Befugnis", essentially without permission, e.g. in case of not a lawful entry of police. Official translation actually distinguishes "unlawful" and later "without permission". I always feel it says, like, illegal entry is illegal. Vandalism uses the same words, section 303a applied to computer sabotage as "Data manipulation".

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_st...

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_st...

PS: the relevant section is 202a "Data espionage", following another comment.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39047283

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_st...

I don't see how that would be any different from unprotected "high" voltage lines, or preferably protected ones for that matter. In house installations around 500V count as Low Voltage in power engineering, by the way.

Piracy of 100 in 1 cartidges for Game Boy was a thing along with Adibas bootleg. Memory was limited and the games are simple because of it. I had a 1 in 4 with space invaders and that was a comparatively shitty game but a hit on Atari (minimum viable product, worse than asteroids). So what killed Atari was extremely low quality, plain and simple.

You may have a point on price control, because I saw no main titles, and I remeber more recently the Mame community held back on (highly priced) arcade titles to not compete with sales. But you present a false dichotomy because quality control is marketing.

> it's fair to say those bounds are not commercially reasonable in general for functional sites. QED the banners are de facto required.

For all I care your site isn't required to be commercially viable. If you aren't able to convince the customer and instead opt for so-called cooky-terror banners as a dark pattern with the primary goal of de-sensitive-izing users, you don't deserve my cooky. Opt-in means legislation has passed this view into law, with the quirk that the dark-pattern is fully expected because the industry needs a sort of legitimization for the use of private data. Small companies usually suffer under compliance, no doubt.

Besides, what has this to do with AI prompts? No doubt they want to analyse every single interaction as a sort of supervised training for free. This does not rely on third party cookies, but it might benefit from making identifications which somebody could argue are not essential to the service as advertised.

Is that the kind of tooling that site operators have grown to find indispensable over the last couple of decades, that you mention?

> Sometimes they are literally an OCR of the print book! You can tell because of the symbol substitutions.

Not really. TEX for example does a lot of weird character substitution behind the scenes to mangle the layout.

it'll lead to more hidden advertisement

I'm currently in a brick build house which has a good ten percent slope, because the earth sank, but it hasn't collapsed. I'm pretty sure its not older than a hundred years and I'm amazed it still stands because it sure wasn't designed like this.

Proof by construction, the Curry-Howard correspondance.

that's ELI5

The wavelength at the size of a watermolecule in the range of Exahertz x-ray rather implies very precise laser pulses because the focal point is proportional to the wavelength. It is also relevant for energy transfer into molecules at resonant frequencies.

from the last paragraph linked above:

> For example, attosecond pulses can be used to push molecules, which emit a measurable signal. The signal from the molecules has a special structure, a type of fingerprint that reveals what molecule it is, and the possible applications of this include medical diagnostics.

Basically it's a more precise higher energy X-Ray laser.

I believe the fast turning on and off is a byproduct of a basic method (high-harmonic generation). They do stress the importance of short pulses, but this again may have to do with decoherence of the focal point and not so much the speed of electrons inside the molecule, which is only a model (i.e. relativistic) and remains to be investigated with this new method.

This trend is generally true for print. If smaller presses don't go out of business, due to the advantage of newer facilities, they are subsidized or bought out by bigger players.

it depends a lot on who you ask, so that part is human, and the part that you didn't specify is ambiguous enough that the answer can only be yeah no.

Classic tell me what you need proven and I'll forge you the statistics.

Here is hope they use something like category theory mixed with philosophy to put it on a secure foundation