post-it

What's a crash going to do? The internet didn't disappear after the dot com bubble popped.

> And ideology of pointlessness where any time you do or learn anything, you get told that why bother you should have used AI.

Who cares? Anyone can tell you anything online.

Melodramatic.

> I now have every incentive to not share my work, while also being wary of anything I find online that has been shared. If it hasn’t been polluted by slop code, it might have been poisoned with a malicious library, send data off to third parties, or itself be comprised of someone else’s stolen work, implicating me in the crime.

All of this was a concern before.

> If I make my code available, AI can be used to more easily discover vulnerabilities to abuse my coding errors, while if I keep my code closed it is far more difficult to find those same mistakes.

This has always been a tradeoff.

> If I publish my code on a public service like GitHub, I am likely to be inundated with pull requests generated by AI bots and inexperienced users, flooding me with mostly useless slop and taking all of my spare time away just triaging it.

Then disable PRs?

This guy has four public repos on GitHub, two of which are forks. I get the impression he does more philosophizing about writing code than actually writing code.

A/an herb, for example.

Why don't you do it?

I like the data collection features of smart watches.

They'll ship it out of Churchill. The only special interest groups are Indigenous and they rarely successfully hold up projects that are actually important.

How would a reviewer catch that?

I find it's comparable to the data from my Apple Watch.

I like to look down at my wrist and see the time down to the second, and my Apple Watch S7 can't deliver on that. Either the screen doesn't light up, or it lights up after a second or so, or it lights up but it's showing me the Smart Stack or an old notification instead of the watch face. And the screen fades quickly and hides the second hand (my girlfriend's S10 shows the second hand when the screen is dimmed, so they've at least fixed that in newer models).

It also needs to be charged daily which is inconvenient, whereas a normal watch lasts for years, and the smart ring lasts several days.

The smart phone integration features don't really work well either. It'll buzz with a notification, I'll look down and there's nothing. 2-3 seconds later the notification appears, but it'll only say who it's from, not the contents, despite my privacy settings being set correctly. I tap it, and a second later the message appears. I may as well have pulled out my phone instead.

By normal, these are the criteria I've decided I want in a watch, after trying out a handful from aliexpress:

- Quartz mechanism - day-date - Arabic numerals - light face - some sort of illumination

Where there's a will, there's a way. There hasn't been a will until now.

Canada is definitionally a federation.

I don't think they're talking about WWII.

I hope it means we'll allow EU cars on our roads.

Canada will be competing in Eurovision 2027 in May. :)

> It is useless to have smart rings do the primary stuff of what a smart watch does

Not for me. I like wearing a normal watch, and I don't want to wear two watches.

All of these problems are solved by buying a CA$35 Colmi ring off Aliexpress.

1. If your finger changes size, spend another $35 for a second one.

2. If it gets scratched to shit, buy another one. Though I lift with my plastic R09 and there's only a bit of scratching around the edge. Other models are metal and should resist scratching better.

3. If it eventually breaks, get another one. Personally I fidget with mine a lot, so removing it before or after washing my hands happens unconsciously.

On top of that, the protocol has been reverse engineered so you can use Gadgetbridge or make your own app instead of using the stock one.

Colmi smart rings have a reverse-engineered Bluetooth protocol, so you can use Gadgetbridge instead of the official QRing app and keep everything local.

You read Snow Crash and missed that it was fiction.

It makes a difference to our understanding of the conditions under which life can form.

How come the things I'm travelling towards seem to stretch further away the faster I go? Doesn't length contraction work the opposite way?

Edit: ah I did some googling and relativistic aberration has the opposite effect and beats out length contraction.

I think there's a big difference between products that are inherently harmful to the environment and products that are only harmful because the producer chooses to behave harmfully. European regulators should just stop Ikea from clear cutting virgin forests.

Eh, I kinda get it. For a brief time, the Mario pipes were more associated with Flappy Bird than with Mario itself. That was fine, and the game died out quickly, but if the pipes became associated with Mario's cock, or if the IKEA layout became associated with a bloodbath pvp game, those associations could easily overtake the original meanings in popular culture, and the original brands would never be the same.

I think that would be a fair price to pay for freeing our society from the shackles of pretending you can own an idea, but I get where these executives are coming from.

Yeah, the total mass of all my Ikea furniture is probably equivalent to one hardwood table, so it can't be that bad for the environment.

I don't believe in intellectual property, but to the extent that we live in a world where IP exists, the original game as described is pretty clearly using IKEA's trade dress.

We know light is not being absorbed and re-emitted, because re-emission sends light in a random direction.

Your solution sounds significantly more complicated actually.

That's life. I'm lucky to be interested in and also good at a profession that pays well. If I lose that and in exchange everyone gets to be good at making software, then that's a sacrifice I feel obligated to make for the benefit of humanity, and I'll still have more savings than someone not in this profession.

As opposed to what? The password needs to reach the server. Encryption is the job of HTTPS.

Claude is perfectly happy to do it and gives great suggestions. I can't imagine it will last, I did run into one situation where I wanted to archive all the media on a subscription site before my subscription expired, and it refused. But splitting it into one session to collect all URLs and a second session to plug them into yt-dlp with the right arguments worked just fine.