690 karma · joined November 4, 2010
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/gregp; my proof: https://keybase.io/gregp/sigs/QgiIp98x2U7msN3u5ALaQ3QN24GIIjLHJKrbs7su73E ]
But all of those other headlines are wrong and misleading as well, in their own way.
The "court"(s) cannot "block" Trump from doing anything. They don't control the military. All they can do is "say" something about the "legality" of the actions of the commander in chief of the military. The first two headlines that (according to the link) "beg to mislead" are closer to accuracy on this dimension -- the courts said something.
But “purposeful” does not mean “having to do with the concept of purpose”, so “teleological” ends up being a pretty useful word. Despite the smell of old books it carries.
Here are the datasets: http://download.kiwix.org/zim/stack_exchange/
It's not clear to me why the data set shrank between 2019/3 and 2022/6; was something excluded? Compression improvements?
> stackoverflow.com_en_all_2019-02.zim 2019-03-12 19:53 134G
> stackoverflow.com_en_all_2022-05.zim 2022-06-17 12:36 75G
With that context, I can clearly see why nobody in a city would want to have more than 2 children.
Do you have a citation for this? I've been trying to clarify the argument recently and am looking for other perspectives.
2. To travel comfortably. More generally, to be able to seek out distant experiences without fear.
Then yes, we damn well better demand that profit be the correct goal for every action regardless of organizational structure.
If our system is distorted to inaccurately measure profit locally, without properly accounting for negative externalities, then that's a legitimate problem, but the way to solve it is by factoring those hidden costs back into the profit calculation, not giving up on "profitability" properly defined.
Logic and health are not the issue here, entrenchment of economic interests is the point.
We've added instrumentation to our recognition capabilities in order to socialize and gossip about derived categories through language. In addition, we (can sometimes) use the formalized expressions of these categories prepared for socialization to ensure internal consistency.
Artificial neural networks that did something similar could have a number of major philosophical and practical advantages: - enable decentralization of data sets - grow with humans rather than apart from them - enable identifying problematic internal inconsistencies
Probably this is not the FCC since its mandate is too broad. But if some such agency had the ability to force municipalities to allow private infrastructure investment, we might start to get the internet we want pretty quickly.
Similarly, money provides no power in society to the person controlling it. Because if we all stopped believing that it would continue to work in the future, it wouldn't.
... This is an obviously incorrect argument! There are things that occur only because of widespread belief. Nevertheless, those things do occur!