690 karma · joined November 4, 2010
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/gregp; my proof: https://keybase.io/gregp/sigs/QgiIp98x2U7msN3u5ALaQ3QN24GIIjLHJKrbs7su73E ]
If you mean to do so quickly, and without taking some significant risk, I'll call.
Such capacity is the only thing I ever envy about others: the power to craft their environment and sculpt their own experience to fit their desires, regardless of content. The relative difference is entirely incidental, since I primarily notice only others who are further up the hierarchy.
Is it just me? It seems like a major fallacy to think that in general people desire power over other humans as an end in itself.
Perhaps it's the technocrat talking, but the ideal situation seems to be Unenvied Power: pure power over one's environment, with zero conscious representation of that power in others' minds.
Well, actually, there is -- the only thing that can express that would be making progress on the problem...
If you're ready for a big dose of realism (and at the risk of fueling some dangerous fires), one can dig deeper into the trust disconnect that fuels acqui-hires here:
https://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/vc-istan-7-s...
drag and drop does not, yet, but perhaps with this initiative it will be prioritized.
Can't remove raidz's from zpools, but `btrfs device delete` exists.
Emotional inception vs. cultural imprinting might instead be considered a partition of the subconscious "association" space into first and second order effects, which are of course concurrent, and both of which are "quick" heuristics. Cultural imprinting is then the simulation mechanism underlying self-image manipulation, as you mention.
(as an aside, more Kruglanski references would be helpful, and maybe less ad hominem)
It also, as a secondary effect, might incline us to look more favorably on Comcast's arguments regarding backbone capacity negotiations.
What you're proposing would be a radical expansion of the facebook ecosystem, not a departure.