Technical workarounds aside, the blog author should get approval from his manager/ceo to purchase commercial nginx. I don't see what's unreasonable about a profitable business paying for a useful commercial feature.
215 karma · joined March 19, 2013
Technical workarounds aside, the blog author should get approval from his manager/ceo to purchase commercial nginx. I don't see what's unreasonable about a profitable business paying for a useful commercial feature.
I meant that dart is chrome-only in practice. I don't know of any other browser vendor that bundles the dart vm, including the few browsers based on chromium like rockmelt or 360.
> However, I think that even if initial reaction might have been better with such a response, Google clearly did the right thing by being up front about their vision.
I can appreciate Google's directness regarding Dart's intention. However, from a web developer's perspective, Dart's multiple backends is very unappealing. I hesitate to adopt even a language like clojurescript or coffeescript because of debugging barriers and potential bugs in the language's crevices (though these problems are diminishing with things like source map support).