> Be angry at copyright
But this isn't about copyright, they're changing it to appease to the woke authoritarian cult.
180 karma · joined January 24, 2022
But this isn't about copyright, they're changing it to appease to the woke authoritarian cult.
Elite-accepted Populist with aggressive net-zero policies that are driving down low-income self-employed workers.
So are they feeding them fast food or not?
You know what's kept those wages outside London so low?
That's a symptom of their abuse of power, not intrinsic to the problem of the idea of media neutrality even being possible.
> 2. Even if they wanted to present neutral viewpoints, such a thing does not exist. You never have all information – so the best you can do is go for something fact based and be very strict about the verification of these facts. And a ton of things are just not knowable at all. Staying fact based and not using emotions to steer people is a waste of your power (see point 1)
Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. You can present 2-3 of the main viewpoints on a matter with non-agressive or pursuasive language and that would be _far_ better than the bias we have now.
> 3. Even if there was a "neutral" viewpoint, neutral for whom? When I as an European for example watch the political discourse in the US I can't help but feel the "center" of the discourse is relatively far to the right in comparision to what a typical European would consider "neutral".
That's because there is a monoculture of thought in EU political discourse, and active supression of dissident views. It's against your interest to support this. Millions of people in Europe are brainwashed with viewpoints they parrot but never question.
> If you roll out universal persona that talks to everybody, the natural consequence will be that it will take on a different face depending to whom they are talking to
Why?! What an earth are you talking about?
I'll stick with Argo Workflows thanks.
How is that appropriate?
More gaslighting.
The fact is this behaviour and bias was rejected and ignored as "paranoia" for years until these files were released to confirm it all and worse - US intelligence and law enforcement involvement.
Shame on them & you.
lmao
A great summary that echoes my experience.
If you asked a heart surgery patient mid surgery if they're doing OK their -- and any professional's -- answer would range from "no, my chest is open" to "inconclusive until the surgery is complete.
then
> it doesn't seem to be getting pursued aggressively by the US.
?
Grotesque.
The massive links to the Democractic party probably have something to do with this.