The answer is: some do, some don't.
770 karma · joined July 31, 2022
The answer is: some do, some don't.
knowing LI doesn't have any NSFW content, is full of marketing content (both corporate marketing and self boasting individuals), tends to prefer positive signals (all projects succeed, etc.), is mostly done in English, and so on...
... There is clearly a market for text generation in this language bubble. Think of all the internal and external communication in your $BigCorp. That has immediate use not only in marketing, but also HR, recruitment, company policing, etc. Your next company town hall can be prepared and led (!) by this thing.
In some rare cases there's a direct feedback button in the product itself. Then usually you don't get the response, but at least your remarks are read by someone. Or at least that's the impression I get.
As a positive example - check out the new commit view page in GitHub which they are currently rolling out. There's a Feedback button which goes to a *public* discussion page with voting and comments. One can tell they are really into listening the feedback. And that's something. At least one of the miracles for free.
I don't think we as humanity have adopted a reasonable approach towards "helping the planet". I know it could be hard, but how about listing top N polluters and addressing these? Or top N factors where the biggest possible gain is and addressing these?
Instead I am preached on plastic straws and laundry detergent.
The bottom one is understood also by developers with no Python experience.
So I guess it depends on the audience.
The technical perspective is that things like wildcard subdomains (e.g. to support yourcustomername.example.com), or DNSSec if your compliance requires it, etc. cause an extra burden if done for these two use-cases at a time.
> can't easily click
Http pages don't have problems with having a link to example.net from within example.com. Or the opposite. Seems like an unrelated problem.
So kind of both.
Wikipedia is a household brand. They could, but they don't need it for anything.
Reverse geocode is `coordinates -> address`.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_geocoding.
Geocoding is `address -> coordinates`.
Wait. Since when this is a requirement?
So I figure it takes a longer time for the devices to be close to each other to raise an alarm.
Now back to the mail thief, I suppose an hour or two is enough to catch them.
It's hard to understand for non-crypto specialists. It uses notions which are unknown to most programmers like MAC or other *MACs.
So not sure who is the target audience for this.
I have worked with CVS myself in the past and would probably have no problem getting used to again.
Some fresh out of school smart people might consider it a thing of the past. And just decide not to deal with it. Like COBOL.
This is likely true for existing developers. But might discourage some fresh blood from joining. So in the long run the overall productivity might suffer from this.