edit: There are two other open source Type C projects (and they stick with the Hostess snack theme):
360 karma · joined January 14, 2011
edit: There are two other open source Type C projects (and they stick with the Hostess snack theme):
All in all I think for the average user (who doesn't even know what firmware is), signed images are a good thing.
See pages 16-19
Paying $200 for a bunch of Steam games might be fine, as long as you know what you're getting... Or, you might feel scammed if you thought you were getting a complete game and later discovered you had to pay more via IAP to get what you thought you paid for in the first place.
This change (not calling IAP apps "free") is part of trying to inform the consumer. I'm not sure if it's the best solution as IAP seems like its own category, but that's the goal.
When I was taught Verilog for IP implementation, one thing I noticed is that people get caught in the trap of trying to abstract away the hardware or approach it from a higher level. Haskell/Verilog 2001/SystemVerilog all give us tools to do this. However, when trying to make real silicon, you need to understand what is actually getting built (i.e. know exactly how many flip flops you're creating and how they fan out) and then use the language to describe it. If you use a 'for' loop to try to do computation, as you might in a programming language, you could end up with something entirely unexpected or unsynthesizable.
Traditionally you first design your module conceptually on a whiteboard (or Excel, Viso, etc.), then implement it in an HDL. Because of the influx of software engineers trying to get into hardware (via FPGAs, etc.), there has been a trend in trying to obfuscate away the details of the implementation, and this can cause a lot of confusion.
That said, I've heard of projects that already translate native Haskell to HDL with some success. I'm not a programmer so I don't claim to understand if it's a good idea, but I still think understanding exactly what's being output is important to knowing if it can perform in a reasonable way, especially if you're doing something of any complexity.
I'd love to hear a comparison of the two by someone knowledgeable about the subject.
I guess the question is, did all other traffic see the same drop? And what changes in their network would cause this?
What you're actually doing is wearing Glass and enjoying dinner per the first frame - but what everyone (at least the PA authors) thinks you're doing is what's indicated in the second frame.
I've also interviewed many people wearing a wide variety of clothing, and no one cares about that either. If we judged interviews based on what people wore, drove, ate, etc. we'd never get any competent engineers. A good culture fit means they interested in technology and our product, not that they fit some (in my experience false) stereotype.
As for your test, if there is a big change in how you dress (in any way) after people know you, it will garner notice.
Also the game was capturing the ChromeOS volume, brightness, maximize keys (probably as F1-F10 keys) and discarding them.
Past issues specific to the packaged app - great game! Very polished. I love X-Com and this is right up my alley.
As one of the few who have actually used it, can you give us your perspective on the highlights and limitations of the packaged apps API?
"You want to innovate in mobile? ...deal with the made men who run the relevant cartel. And if they don't like you or your idea, your innovation goes nowhere."
Is that better?
edit: To explain, I think how they expect you to experience the website is: http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/ (from www.google.com/chromeos)
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/features.html
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/features-key.ht...
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/features-device...
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/chromebox.html
So, we're looking at a relatively deep link, which assumes the reader has been shown the main OS features and is looking for which specific product to buy. That said, I agree that this page doesn't do much except show pretty pictures and throw out a few tech specs, and won't sell the product on its own.