It’s fine, I think, to answer a question and then suggest a better method. It’s presumptuous in the extreme to dismiss a question with some pseudoacademic neologism.
292 karma · joined May 4, 2023
It’s fine, I think, to answer a question and then suggest a better method. It’s presumptuous in the extreme to dismiss a question with some pseudoacademic neologism.
LEO = <2000km altitude, and
rEarth = ~6300m, so
surface area of a sphere with r=6300km => ~500,000,000 km^2
surface area of a sphere with r=8300km => ~860,000,000 km^2
so roughly 1.5x the surface area at max LEO compared to earth's surface
(feel free to correct me if my arithmetic is off :)
As far as I can tell, there is no regular consumer access planned for it. It seems like a missed opportunity on their part.
To play devil's advocate,
- With data plans based on minimum speed, there would still be a possibility of service being degraded below the paid-for minimum speed during times of high usage at a cell site. There would have to be an asterisk in the contract to the effect that minimum speeds would only be supplied while possible. And, ideally, some regulatory oversight to ensure sufficient cell site capacity is installed based on the cumulative speed of the plans sold, if that makes sense.
- I wonder, to what degree is the structure of cell phone data plans constrained by regulation and private agreements? IOW, are carriers allowed, under current regulation, to sell minimum-speed plans? How complicated and time-consuming would it be to unwind inter-carrier cell-site-sharing agreements?
For those who haven't seen it, Freedom Downtime is a movie by the 2600 gang which is mostly about Mitnick's imprisonment, and the whole Free Kevin movement.
(I wonder who wrote the obituary, it's especially wide-ranging, and poetic in parts.)
Have been thinking about a roof rack for sheet goods. Can't see why it wouldn't work.
“The best [counter-argument] is probably the issue of deep mining,” Schmidt said. “We are mining very old deposits for metals and ore, and if these had been depleted by a prior civilization, it might have been noticed. These place limits on the scope of a prior civilization, but don’t eliminate the possibility.”
This has interested me before, and I think it's good evidence to the contrary.
I am not a geologist, but from what I know, "Very old" means the precambrian shield in Canada, for example, which is among, if not the, oldest rock on earth (~3.6Gy). Oldest, because before that time, the planet was molten on its surface. We're mining that today, and the geology can be fit to geological models: afaik, the geology being encountered in the very old rock is what people expect to see from naturally-occurring processes.
I do still wonder, though, what rock would look like after ~billions of years, if parts of it had been mined out, and whether that mining would be detectable. The rock is hard rock; would you see a corridor of rubble in solid rock, from a collapsed tunnel? Or are there still enough geological forces acting on the rock to turn the rubble from a collapsed tunnel into something resembling metamorphic placer (river-borne) rock, for example?
Interesting question, either way.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/07/massive-peak-collaps...
Again, I'm sure this has been thought of and rejected for a good reason. Still, doing it piecemeal doesn't seem to be working.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydyztGZnbNs
He seemed happy enough with the language.
Presumably you were being sarcastic, but it’s still caustic. What stereolab called easy cynicism.
Should have had an ellipsis between the 2nd and 3rd bit, but the intent wasn't altered. He's calling it gibberish and nonsense.
I wasn't trying to imply that he actually was confused, I was trying to show how he thought the term was gibberish.
I mean, who would take seriously the thought that Ellison actually thought of himself as an idiot.
"it is the most nonsensical .. maybe I'm an idiot, it's really just complete gibberish..."
Error descriptions are probably too much to ask these days - I would bet they'd be perceived as intimidating by the UX group, given that the same group seems to prefer a level of discourse appropriate for grade-school classrooms.
A error code would be wonderful, though, since it would be a nice unique search term. It could be put in small greyed-out text in a bottom corner, too, to make everyone happy.
I think a good general rule is: for a single sentence, not capitalizing the first letter (and not using a period) is fine. Longer than that and it both makes parsing more difficult and looks strongly like an affectation. There is a practical purpose for sentence start/end punctuation.
"The sheepish alienation of sitting through “Inside Out” amid the static of my fellow-theatregoers’ sniffles and nose honks must have been what Data from “Star Trek” felt like all the time."
I too got 11% but stuck assiduously to powered vehicles on the ground of or launched from the park.
I did not include the tank.
I also got the exact same percentage saying 'yes' to everything.
I also got the exact same percentage saying 'no ' to everything.
27 * .11 ~= 3, fwiw
I recently spent a hair-pulling near-week encountering then trying to figure out the DLL search path in Win32 because a library was messing around with it. Documentation is straightforward enough, I suppose, until you get to SetDefaultDllDirectories, which has this in its discussion: "It is not possible to revert to the standard DLL search path or remove any directory specified with SetDefaultDllDirectories from the search path."
I guess my point is, environment variables can be tricky.
> I don't think this is a sound argument because of survivorship bias.
The argument is that those projects prove large C programs/systems are maintainable. 'Survivorship bias' doesn't enter into it; they are large and have been well maintained.
Edit: I remember a time when "correlation is not causation" was the endlessly-repeated phrase. La plus ca change, la plus c'est la meme.
Also, it's worth acknowledging that projections like the Robinson projection are often used now instead of Mercator on general-purpose wall maps.
Since the topic came up, this is one of my favourite special-purpose global maps: a map of global ocean circulation, centred around Antarctica: https://old.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/c4et3x/global_ocea...
Perhaps a reordering of their method, using the existing caret notation:
b^p = r :: the result from base b with exponent p
^pr = b :: the base giving result r from exponent p
br^ = p :: the exponent yielding r with base b
[1] https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1158802I spent a not inconsiderable amount of time trying to find a fix, including removing an internal cable and putting electrical tape over the top. Nothing worked. The closest I got was keeping the wireless keyboard plugged into its USB-C charger so that the timeout period before shutoff was longer than it was in battery-only mode.
All of which is annoying, because it's not cheap (>$100), and the fix is so stupefyingly simple - an addition of one or two settings in the configuration software. And, yes, countless people have reported this to Logitech and their 'support' consists, at best, of saying "I'll pass this on to The Team".
Never have I been more tempted to go all-in and become a firmware hacker, though the feasibility in time and probability of success are both quite low.