3,419 karma · joined June 5, 2017
hn_public_email@pck.email
Evidence? What's the evidence this is a linear growth process? How many years? At what age? What populations? There is no rigor here at all.
What the heck am I supposed to take away from this?
This is a half ass theory, not evidence.
Where's a shred of evidence, on the time scales here, these "units of information" are retained (under either method). Are they even relevant compared to a _skill_ like reading that enables quicker information ingestion across an entire life o and is applicable across a wider range of problems than _individual information units you read_??
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/402554/11/src/cryp...
I still use it.
So, sure, this is awesome but it might not be something worth optimizing for if you want to make money.
Thanks!
I do highly recommend starting with one of the Dream example projects just to lower the barrier to entry on the tooling side.
You can also use Rescript (compiles to very readable Javascript), which is the OCaml type system with more familiar syntax and some of the complexity shaved off.
[1] https://www.quippd.com/writing/2022/07/19/MBNA-stops-support...
Why not increase the potential pool of buyers with specs that are acceptable to them?
Also, M1 Architecture over Intel taps into solid state storage speeds to aggressively use swap storage when mem pressure exists. It really seems to be smooth, I've not noticed much hiccups. You might remember folks getting upset at this a year back because of the unexpectedly high SSD wear that results.
But there's a market for programming languages that OCaml is objectively losing. Can we really not agree that the most popular/recommended build tool requiring you to write a lisp to do basic config probably isn't helping draw new user into the fold?
I doesn't have to be cargo. But the more it rhymes with that degree of user experience, the more the "masses" will discover the things that make ocaml great.
I'm sure there's a crowd, especially here on HN, that views this as some sort of purity test for the language, but in my opinion it's needlessly obtuse over <insert more readable and traditional and lintable type here> used by modern build systems.
Then there's the fact that several `init` commands don't actually fully `init` a project (and up until recently, the very example in OCaml's getting started documentation was broken).
Then there's this insanity
dune build
dune test
dune exec # hahaha no, no, this doesn't work.
Then you gotta manually tape together crap between opam and dune (and don't get me started on how insane the lockfile situation is -- I swear to god I complained once and someone told me I should learn to use nix!).This is all very fun and yak shave-ey and I generally grin and bear it, but boy do I totally get why most people look at me like I'm a weirdo because I like this language.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/273
Real answer though is "it depends", so ask a lawyer about specific facts.
Anyone else here who would have remained ignorant of this all absent this lawsuit?
Sounds like you already know what you want to do. If you need help, please see a professional therapist. It isn't weakness, it isn't for other people, it isn't weird. You've had some serious trauma. Your lawyer makes a bad therapist. Court systems make for bad therapy. HN comments will never be the answer to something so deeply personal.
I hope for the best for you and your family.
- Long-suffering bash user