But there's this:
324 karma · joined July 28, 2014
But there's this:
And with regards to school[2]: "Research finds that men engage in more abstract thinking about many topics—using categories, generalizations—while women are more disposed to context-specific thinking—in terms of concrete situations and relationships. This is evident, for one thing, in how some psychologists contrast the moral reasoning of males and females. Males’ moral judgments tend to be governed by abstract principles of justice, duty, and fairness that apply to all people and situations (e.g., whether a law is broken, whether justice is served). Females’ moral judgments give more weight to specific relationships between people and extenuating circumstances in a given situation; moral judgments are made through subjective feelings (e.g., whether someone feels betrayed or harmed) rather than abstract principles."
And we know from other research, that people who fail in introductory programming classes, fail on that point exactly - they have problems with working with programs that manipulate variables without some meaning.
Add to that that in many fields of study women choose, there's relatively a lot of human interactions, and the goals are towards helping humans,one would see why CS doesn't have the biggest appeal for females ,and why the story of other professions evolved differently.
And that might guide us to some changes in CS curriculum - like maybe teaching in a more concrete way. But one wonders , isn't good CS mostly about abstraction ?
[1]http://onlinelaw.wustl.edu/women-law-infographic/
[2]http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-roles-and-seei...
One common advice is to buy from authorized sources, and looking through octopart[1], arrow is the only distributor of anadgim, with 1000 units minimum quantities.
[1]http://octopart.com/partsearch#!?q=anadigm&sortby=avg_price%...
With regards to eink web-apps, don't forget you'll also have to fight the keyboard if you'll even get one. So it's hard to design to that medium. On that note, there's the onyx eink phones/tablets that have a version of the play store, but their only unique apps are rss reader and google calender. But maybe sniffing around onyx and their users will let you discover usable apps.
Whether this company did this or not is unknown, if they are offering this system on a per month basis, it makes sense they did some reasonable level of analysis of costs, because it would reduce their risk greatly.
http://castillium.co.uk/tracking-solar/tracking-250kw/
So qbotix might have good solutions for the issues you mention. And that is of course without having concentrated solar power, which makes a qbotix a more attractive offer.
And by the way i think this observing robot has(or can have) an internal definition of self, and an observer beyond the self. It seems possible.
BTW we've already implemented consciousness in a robot: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/automaton-robots-b... and it's useful. But AFAIK, i don't think it's used in any commercial system, although that's the kind of thing a commercial company won't advertise.
On the other hand, Amazon is Google's biggest threat in general product search(and probably discovery). So surely Amazon is even stronger in books.
And i'm sure Amazon does play with search/recommendation ranking, and publishers see the effect on sales, or else they wouldn't have bothered with this fight.
But it's a good discovery, another drug is always useful.
About parking, this is less important for a taxi company.
And the incentives for self driving cars are huge , even as regional taxi companies, so connecting the traffic lights into the net(read only) as backup doesn't seem like a big problem.
The real interesting question is: does it really need "generalized intelligence" , or all the examples the article mentioned could be coded decently enough on a case by case basis, to a point where self driving car is much safer than a car ? We don't yet know the answer, but the current safety of Google's car are promising in that regard.
If they can achieve what they promise, they'll regain their place in the history books.
Second there's a debate whether SOI is more expensive once it reaches volume. The claim vary between 10% more expensive , to cheaper , to something in the middle. We'll see.
This enabled them to build a huge(100MB) and fast(3TB/sec) L3 cache in their processors. This is something that could give a huge boost for many kinds of applications, for example databases d\and machine learning.
While intel has some edram capability, i haven't seem them release an integrated edram with the processor, not sure why.
And let's not forget, IBM now licenses the design for it's beast of a processor, the power8 ,in a modular format, enabling chip companies to easily add accelerators and innovate.
So it would be very interesting what intel's competitors will build with all those capabilities. I'm getting the popcorn.
But they aren't commonly used. It's probably because of medical conservatism coupled with business and status reasons.
And in some cases it does help to have the medical interview with a person. But wouldn't a cheaper nurse armed with a great software tool, offering a 20/30 minutes appointment is better than 7/10 minutes of a doctor's time? In some places in the british system that's what happens and research says the results are comparable to a doctor , with patients being happier.
2. There are crowd sourced solutions like you specify. The one i know is a ycombinator company called crowdmed.com . At least according to the media they do bring something very good to the table, but they're very new so it'll probably some mote time to see how they function and scale.
As an aside, there's an an expert system by a company called isabel healthcare, that in the hands of a regular family physician ,can enable regular physicians to diagnose rare and complex diseases at the level of top diagnosticians.It's available via cloud.I'm sure almost no physician of anybody in this thread will have it.
3. Not sure who is to blame, but i think many of those problems are common globally to some extent. Maybe the british system is somewhat better with the policy of employing lower level providers across many roles.
The basic architecture of TOR is limited theoretically with regards to some types of attacks it can handle.TOR developers probably cannot do anything about that.
And in some sense , supporting TOR is taking funding and attention from better anonimity technologies , that might be able to do the job , with enough development. That's another reason why the US government is investing in TOR.
The problem with the Chinese goods is that it's very hard to locate high quality goods. The review systems are useless(full of junk) , and there's little reliable data about quality in english. So amazon becomes the default.
Maybe the person who measured this hasn't used sleep modes properly?
Usually that feeling of "click" passes after 2 years and transforms into a mellower , longer lastin kind of love. So if you stay longer, you see how you both fit together under this new kind of love.
And don't forget, the costs can be much lower when using parcel machines. For example in latvia ,it costs 2 euro to send a package from a postal machine to a postal machine, versus 3.6 euro from a postal machine to someone via courier.
And e-commerce users really hate to pay for shipping.