physPop

Trained writers and journalists know that short sentences are an important tool. They convey directness.

Perhaps that speaks more to your education and that of "most poeple on hn"

I think you need to get out and see what life is like. This isn't a leadership problem at all, it is human nature. No one does sums anymore, we use calculators. We've outsourced computation. But now many workers outsource thinking and communication, which is hugely problematic. So yes, good companies should have AI usage guidance documents, in fact providing clear expectations might be labelled ... leadership.

but you don't have separation of church and state... thats a poor comparison. religious dogma eats into nearly all public discourse.

HN crowd is not representative of the world at large. consumers don't care. cost and convenience are primary motivators.

yes thats the main reason, agda , coq similar ideas

re: wargames https://www.reddit.com/r/homelab/comments/1iboomc/i_spent_a_...

agree. If oia and hf are anything like generic startup / corporate america, IT and security is always seen as a cost center and goes to the lowest bidder. Do we really think they're employing top notch sysadmins?

no it doesn't work at all -- because the LLM isn't sentient, emotional, nor does it care for the user

No. Even for large models that a good mental model. This is parroted all over and is wrong. Its not going to generate out of distribution answers. Its a probabilistic function of the training set.

Its for reasoning not generating art?

and the heating

butterfly and the swoop are both essentially useless too compared to their reference devices

Thats the definition of cherry picking and survivorship bias

no? this isn't what it argues at all. did you read it?

It's not widely known and mostly spun in MSM as fringe theory (thanks to marketing by big AI cos). this is a well written essay, and if it helps the discourse all the better.

Its also cheap, and fire retardant compared to other finishing. It used to be lathe+plaster. And before that plain wood.

China does it and it works well. We just need governments with executive planning capabilities. In my country (Canada) we only have myopic politicians who only care for re-election.

Upton Sinclair: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

false dichotomy.

so you can do the transformations (see the rlisp macro section)

26% means not ai 3/4 times...

If you don't have stakeholders I contend you probably don't have a product, or you're building the bare minimum MVP which upon becoming a product will be woefully inadequate, generating the aforementioned bottleneck.

That's only true if you're making something that's already been done.

python isn't untyped, its dynamically typed https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2351190/static-dynamic-v...

I feel like thats really oversellign coro -- theres still a TON of boilerplate

Aren't utilities, by definition, state owned? Or is that also backwards in america?

Paper mills existed long before LLMs

it does but you need various config tweaks

its not though. the primary job of software engineers is to ship a product that produces income for their employer.

patently false, have you attended one of his lecture series in person?