232 karma · joined May 22, 2012
Some of my favorites of the last year or two are http://reddit.com/r/ExplainLikeIAmA, http://reddit.com/r/mildlyinteresting, http://reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful, http://reddit.com/r/futurology, http://reddit.com/r/outside, and http://reddit.com/r/hwstartups. To name just a few. There is basically no way the reddit founders could have envisioned any of those categories, but thankfully, they had the foresight to create a generic, make-your-own-category platform.
The community of reddit certainly has shifted quite a bit, but this ability to evolve organically will keep it from unraveling in the same way as Craigslist has. I think it's a bad comparison anyway.
The problem is, when you hold your phone horizontally it's painfully obvious to other people you're taking a video. Holding it vertically allows for being more discreet. You might just be texting or something.
Smartphone manufacturers could also solve this problem by somehow auto-rotating the camera internally.
I going to have to contest this point. I live and work in San Francisco, and I do not even own a car. I bike to and from the startup I work for every day. Many people in SF do this.
Not counting buses, taxis, or lyft, I haven't even been in a car for about 5 months.
>"Links in Tweet text must be displayed using the display_url field in the URL entities API response, and link to the original t.co url field"
I already have this and have had it for 5 years, through my credit union.
In fact, just yesterday I overdrafted (first time in years) and was delighted to see it automatically transferred the amount to my credit card. So, it's basically the same as if I had made a purchase of that amount on my credit card.
It's like if you had a jetski, but it was the wrong color. From your approach, you'd say "I'll never ride on that jetski! I'm perfectly fine not riding it."
Yes, clearly you are. You totally, completely, without question have the right to go on living without it. No problem. But the real question isn't whether or not you'll be fine without it. The real question is: are you missing out on pleasure you could be experiencing?
It's just the idea of getting comfortable with the grip and texture of the rungs at the bottom of the ladder before trying to climb it.
So because you were unable to figure it out, no one else will ever have success with it?
> unreasonable hype
Welcome to the real world. Not everything that deserves accolades gets them. The things that are successful- they don't necessarily deserve it. Just look at top-40 music.
So anyway, your post is against the attention the framework has gotten, not the framework itself?
-Pusher sells itself as a WebSockets platform, whereas PubNub is a protocol-independant: it uses the best protocol and technique based on the environment you're using. That means you're protected from dealing with newer protocols on older devices. As techniques mature, PubNub gradually incorporates them into its architecture.
-PubNub is globally distributed in 10 data centers. Pusher is not.
-PubNub's performance is better than Pusher's, according to at least one customer. (https://twitter.com/thfriendly/status/220152602917220352) PubNub's codebase is as close to the metal as possible: written in C and with lots of kernel modifications.
-If you visit Pusher's website and click on the "Scalable" tab, it lists: "40 billion messages delivered". In June 2012 alone, PubNub delivered 44.2 billion messages.
-PubNub recently hit a peak of 1,000,000 messages per second. (http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/13/pubnub-pulse/) I'm not sure on this one, but I don't belive Pusher's numbers are anywhere near that.
Now I've got songkick, which kicks ass at keeping me informed about shows. But the whole reason songkick is so effective for me is that I imported my listening history from last.fm when I first signed up.
You seem to be saying "I'll AB test it just for a little, then weed out the 0% one. but in the case of this new algorithm, I'll let it run for a long time." That's not exactly fair. Not to mention, both algorithms would allow you to clearly see the 0% option sucks.