perf1

Aren't most anti aircraft missiles heat seeking? Could also be a reason why 60% of the engine energy need to go into creating heat. Otherwise cheap gas engine drones that can't be intercepted and can fly thousand of miles could be really dangerous.

Why are there no improvements in traditional petrol engines? They basically convert 60% into heat. Like use the heat to run a steam engine?

Is this meant as a joke? Because almost the whole world is working on outlawing or "regulating" these and they aren't even anonymous most of the time. Not being controlled and centralized is threatening enough.

It's a receipt for disaster. Especially if they centralize it even more by replacing banks with a Central Bank that fully controls the Digital Currency. Which they are already planning and testing. This will be misused. And people can be controlled with this in a really bad way. If your Social Credit Score is low you could be taxed higher or even forbidden to drive your car or travel, for example. Your food choices could be restricted at any moment too if you don't behave.

Renewables make things much worse because they need loots of Gas as Backup if the sun isn't shining or there is no wind. Which happens very often in Germany especially in the Winter.

They are all based on the spike Protein, at least the once available in EU.

Is the end Goal to make the internet only accessible via Digital ID and kill of the anonymity?

There is also the option of using a methane fuel cell that is ignored by everyone.

Kevin O'Leary from Shark Tank pushes for a sustainable Bitcoin. His proposed solution is to have basically "certified" Miners mine clean Coins and never exchange them. Of course if this takes over Bitcoin isn't really decentralized anymore, but he thinks Institutional Investors would prefer that.

So do you want to Forbid News reporting on Cop violonece too, because it can result in violent Protests? What about school shootings. Reporting on that can convince others to do it too.

You mean million that died, had a positive PCR test at some time. There are still less people dying in 2020 than in 2018 in most countries even though population gets older and therefore more people are dying every year on average anyway.

What do you think about one of the Australian Vaccine that got everybody in the study to test HIV positive. I don't think researches know enough to claim it save without long term tests. I also heard that HIV can hide in mRNA from your Immune system. I would call that long lasting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4C9huNGdSw

If this were the case. Biden would be done because he could be blackmailed.

Why would Russia actually support Trump? Fracking and Trump wanting to sell Oil to Europe is really bad for Russia. What did Russia get for allegedly supporting Trump?

In the Article they talk about use in air conditioners. Most ACs don't seam to be able to handle the resistance that HEPA filters would add.

I don't know. If you are right and they make that distinction. I think they even know much less about presymptomatic transmissions. Because why would they leave that information out.

In Germany there are States that are basically virus free. Still the Federal Government after asked by the States to OK lifting of the Mask duty, insist openly that lifting the duty to wear a Mask would let people loose the fear for the virus!

Is it still OK to restrict freedom to just keep people in fear?

WHO says something different:

Q: Can asymptomatic coronavirus disease be transmitted?

A: Asymptomatic transmission refers to transmission of the virus from a person, who does not develop symptoms. There are few reports of laboratory-confirmed cases who are truly asymptomatic, and to date, there has been no documented asymptomatic transmission.

Maybe they convinced themselves that automated cars will come soon and then delivery will become basically almost free.

They already build a clone of their reddit forum a long time ago.

Zinc deficiency also results in loss of smell. I heard the theory that your immune system consumes your Zinc reserves to fight the Virus.

They are allowed to police things that are against their TOS. They just aren't allowed to be biased.

Twitter can also go the publisher route and be biased as much as they want.

Why have a Supreme Court or even normal Judges if Laws are only allowed to be this binary? Why not option 4 you are allowed to censor if you give reason and the reason is in your TOS. But you are for example not allowed to Edit (Fact Check), Censor or manipulate Votes of your political opponents, or loose your libel protections.

Who are these people at risk exactly? I think there isn't enough talk about it. There are studies now that show that zero carb and intermittent fasting can reverse type 2 diabetes. But nobody seams to suggest to people at risk to try to eat less sugar.

My feeling is they pushing the extra crazy ones though. Watching a clearly not well Person argue crazy theories isn't very convincing to healthy people anyway.

On the other Hand people like Dr. Erickson get censored, because they simply dare to question the lock down and argue that there is no evidence supporting it's effectiveness in saving lives.

I started developing a chrome extension that basically allows to watch videos together (synchronizes video playback) and also has an extra twist.

But Google shutting down reviews (temporarily) and all the other drama I read in the pusbullet thread on HN yesterday is a concern for me.

No Platdforms still have to delete illegal content and react to take down notices.

Are they arguing that they are a publisher? Because that would also mean being liable for the content.

They try to mitigate this. They ask you for example to move your hands around your face and bend your ID card.