372 karma · joined March 30, 2012
I don't think there's anything proprietary going on, so I did a quick search. Fastmail supports JMAP [0], and JMAP [1] supports setting special keywords [2] for a message to mark it as spam of phishing. It may be possible to get this to work.
[0] https://www.fastmail.com/dev/
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8621.html
[2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/imap-jma...
There's easily a century between the earliest accurate map of Edinburgh and the earliest accurate map of the world. And even at present, the accuracy of maps of Edinburgh is much greater than the accuracy of maps of the world.
So yeah, the whole world could be next. But the person you're replying to has a point when they say significant improvements are needed.
The person you're responding to does not seem upset to me.
You add an interesting perspective that some people want to find encouragement in these types of essays. And the personal jab just isn't necessary.
And I should have stopped there. But I went on to try to make a point about the quick mental model you proposed about "talking at" vs "talking with". Which I think leads to arguing about semantics (with others or yourself).
What you're saying about the difference between the distribution of behaviors and utterances sounds reasonable to me (if a bit abstract). I just think the specific insight into your friend's behavior is a lot more valuable.
I think this is the insight!
> If I had to devise a quick mental model, it might seem like the difference between talking at someone vs talking with someone?
(And I think this is semantics.)
Wait, what?
I can do that, you can do that, but will a computer be able to do it?
(If you don't want to click the link, there's a joke there that machines may have a hard time "being to cool to care about stuff.")
And you by the way seem very apt in considering other people's emotions. This dilemma you're posing would be hard on anyone to navigate.
Where is this magical place you speak of?
But the author of this post goes even further, and uses both spellings in the same sentence!
In extravert-introvert pairs, extroverts report on greater closeness than introverts
That can't be right...
Video is in The Hague, I've seen it in Amsterdam though, a couple of times.
Well, that's my fallible summary anyway, go read the paper. :-)
Edit, link to the paper: http://eprint.iacr.org/2017/281
The hard part is explaining to our mothers that their music app might become unavailable, that they should care about this, and that they should take action to mitigate the effects.
But on the other hand, consumers get locked in all the time, and civilization hasn't collapsed yet.