22 karma · joined May 9, 2019
Better-equipped or tech savvy groups do this using custom websites today, and some people upload raw data to central “depositories.” A suitably-priced offering of Datasette Cloud could open this up to many more scientists.
Python already has a fantastic ecosystem of biology-related libraries (arguably R’s is better but Python is definitely a contender).
One potential risk is that “omics” datasets are often much bigger than is typical for SQLite.
How does https://please.build measure up?
I see that you’ve built this as a patched version of Postgres, but I’m curious how much of this syntax you could implement as a client library and shell that would run against an existing Postgres instance.
Right away, you would get adoption from people who have an existing Postgres, or who want to take advantage of SaaS offerings like AWS Aurora.
Longer term, I could imagine the client/shell being extended to support multiple backend DB dialects, even things like Spark or Redshift which you’d have a hard time modifying intrusively.
It could also be cool to explore interoperation with existing schemas written in plain SQL, so people could adopt it incrementally that way.