182 karma · joined January 13, 2009
Let the word go forth ... your logical justification please?
You have to do the A/B within the same market to get useful results.
Shenanigans.
"the two tests have a 99% correlation"
"they recruited 77 gifted children through"
[yes, it could be a rounding error]
A worthy insight IMO, one of those 'I know it but it helps to be reminded' comments.
I know it didn't happen this way but some sort of logical order would be good.
The manner in which he was arrested rather suggests a honeytrap [I'm speculating here, assess for yourself] - which could account for any animosity of the UK Government, not particularly wanting to reward spies that fell victim to enemy traps. The other point at issue may be that Turing as a 40 year old was picking up teenagers for sex (according to the reports of his arrest) - would someone now be knighted who knowingly followed that sort of promiscuous lifestyle? Would you expect that to be true also in the mid 20th century?
Turing was a great mathematician and left a great legacy in that field, other aspects of his character appear less clear.
I'm sure the varied interesting diet pays off in staff motivation and happiness.
person1:yay person2:people here like intelligent comments person3:go to digg if you want to yay all the time person1:yay
And have an option to reveal names and/or show them on the mouseover link for personX.
I tend to leave about twice the gap of other vehicles on the motorway, still strictly not the full stopping distance (but having been a motorcyclist I feel I read ahead well). I always find that people invade my stopping/slowing space; then one drops back and another car is in there.
I'm in the UK.
Interesting though.
If one knows that the ball is in the bucket this reinforces the concept that balls go in buckets or reminds one that more often than not people put balls in buckets.
Similar to the way that lots of people pick the same number in a given range or pick the same fruit when asked, etc., the most likely container for people to pick may be a bucket. People could be responding to an innate understanding of this fact; possibly without realising it.
Speculation, but still a decent logical explanation IMO.
A pre-experiment should be performed by asking people which vessel a ball should be placed in; the experiment in question could then choose only vessels with matching preference as ball receptacles as the options.
[I think I got it right, never done Haiku before]