Another surprising number was that Windows users use GCC almost as often as Visual Studio. GCC on Windows is kind of a PITA, and the VS toolchain is really pretty good. Maybe people go with GCC because they need proper C99/C11 support.
839 karma · joined April 19, 2012
Another surprising number was that Windows users use GCC almost as often as Visual Studio. GCC on Windows is kind of a PITA, and the VS toolchain is really pretty good. Maybe people go with GCC because they need proper C99/C11 support.
Look around and you see terrible software everywhere. The medical industry, the legal industry, the insurance industry, small businesses, government entities, etc etc. Almost all of them have terrible websites, terrible internal tools, terrible uptimes, terrible everything. Billions of manhours are spent on tasks that could be better done by software. There's good money in solving those problems, the problem is that there's only so many good engineers in the world, and the hot technology companies snatch up almost all of them.
They say that software is eating the world, and it's true, but so far the world is only 5% eaten. There's plenty of work left to do.
I don't see that happening. There are lots of companies with strong business models (Google/Apple/Amazon/Etc) which will be fine if all the revenueless startups suddenly go away. They'll probably be happy they get to hire up all the newly unemployed talent.
Remember.. just because a downward correction is coming, doesn't mean it's a bubble.
Console games typically have a minimum possible input lag of 60ms, and once you add in the controller response time, TV refresh rate, and the design of the game's engine, it's common to have 100ms or higher. For example Destiny on PS4 has a minimum input latency of 100ms ( http://www.displaylag.com/destiny-lag-factor-review/ )
Point is, consistent input latency is much less noticeable than people seem to think. When people complain about lag they're usually complaining about spikey/inconsistent lag. Consistent 150ms is not a killer. There are billion dollar games that have shipped with worse.
(Source: if you read EVERY page on their mysterious web site, you can eventually suss it out)
Technically, Angular 1.0 also had its own scripting language too. It's kind of inevitable, since Javascript itself is one of the obstacles to making a better web framework.
There's definitely way too much crankiness in the software world, and I don't think it's because the people are naturally negative people. It's because we're pragmatic people and we unconsciously gravitate towards the styles of communication that get the most results.
So, saying that it's "dying" is overstating things a bit. They found their niche (whatever the hell niche they are serving), and there's little motivation to change.
https://unity3d.com/unity/whats-new/unity-4.5#changes https://twitter.com/UnitZeroOne/status/471355979217793024
In one of the email responses, someone pointed out a problem with their code and they responded, "Oops we posted the wrong version" ( http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.user/... ). They aren't exactly being respectful of other people's time with stuff like that.
In secure coding the phrase "the devil is in the details" applies very strongly. So if you don't have the details figured out, you don't have much of anything.
And for any proposed law change, there's always some annoying folks who agree with the overall spirit of the change, but oppose because they disagree with some specific details. Like, maybe the new law doesn't go far enough, or doesn't have the right wording. Or maybe they just object to the process by which it was created or campaigned for.
Usually but not always. You can also have peer dependencies: http://blog.nodejs.org/2013/02/07/peer-dependencies/
So, if someone were to argue, "we should switch to singular-they because 'he' is old-fashioned", then sure, I would totally be on board with that. Something I didn't know until today, is that singular-they is actually a pretty old idea with a lot of precedent.
But some people (like Joyent) seem to be saying, "anyone who uses 'he' instead of 'they' is being sexist," which is just going totally overboard. Lots of well-regarded style guidelines say the opposite, so quit with your witch-hunt logic.