passwordle

> People experience their thoughts very differently

what does this mean?

Agreed.

>if the organization is dysfunctional, it won't be beaten by a better one, and (2) it has little incentive to improve.

Source? Ever heard of elections? Sounds like a braindead libertarian software developer take on a topic you have no idea about to me

That's what an asshole would say

Every morning, I wake up about 7:00 a.m. or 7:15 a.m., and then I usually have a glass of water that I put on the bedside table the night before. Then I make my bed, and then I go into the bathroom and I shave, brush my teeth, and take a shower. Next, I come back into my bedroom, and, if it's a work day, I put on my security uniform.

>Considering how many desokupa services exist I'd say it's a real problem.

None of what you said sounds like a problem. What is the problem? It sounds like a policy to ensure dwellings, which are obviously a scarce resource in those areas have actual people living in them. That is kind of their point. Of course it would be beneficial to have a better legal framework to ensure housing security and building maintenance.

I think not what parent comment said?

> There was some followup information about what happened after this. She was picked up by a car and taken to the next place to occupy.

I'm so sorry to hear that your friend eventually had to sell his vacation home. Fuck that poor woman and her two kids, if they're so poor they should live on the streets in the dirt where they belong !

That's interesting. You can also use books on public minecraft servers to store basically infinite amount of base64 encoded data for completely free if you already own the game. Besides the cow farm you'll need anyways for leveling and enchanintg you just have to make an infinite sugarcane farm. The most space efficient way is to have the soil pieces arranged in a "Z"-shaped Tetris piece around water sources, but a linear layout may be more time efficient during farming or when automating it.

source?

What is it?

Going solo in trading is a very different beast compared to trading at a prop firm. Yes, capital is a significant factor. The more you have, the more you can diversify and absorb losses which are inevitable in trading. However, it's not just about the capital. The infrastructure, data access, and risk management systems at a prop firm are usually far superior to what you could afford or build on your own as an individual trader.

Moreover, the collaborative environment at a prop firm can't be understated. Ideas and strategies are continuously debated, tested, and refined. This collective brainpower often leads to more robust strategies than what you might come up with on your own.

That said, there are successful solo traders, but they often specialize in niche markets where they can leverage unique insights or strategies that aren't as capital intensive. It's definitely not for everyone and comes with its own set of challenges and risks.

This topic has been researched and discussed extensively in the embodied cognition branch of cognitive science. It's mentioned as a central aspect of cognition in Margaret Wilson's landmark paper " Six views of embodied cognition" (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12613670/) which came out 12 years before this one. I'm surprised to not see much of the extensive research that has been on this idea before cited here.

bro, nice dubs!