parsadotsh

Are you paying for ChatGPT? OpenAI is very bad at communicating that their free models are not what "AI in 2026" is about.

I for one appreciate them sharing this and found it a very interesting read. Many of us don't have experiences at companies at this scale and so it's nice whenever I get to read about what happens behind the scene.

Also once a month? Really?

Yes it is amazing, and it was and is a big deal

- Working dev

> Bank Deposit

> After you complete your order, you will receive an order confirmation email with wire details. NOTE: UNPAID ORDERS WILL BE CANCELED AFTER 5 DAYS. You will receive another email when your payment has been received and an email when your order ships. Deliveries to residential addresses may require a phone call for scheduling.

Whenever I see lots of comments from newly created accounts praising a product I think: Astroturfing?

But then I start thinking about how easy it would be to try to ruin a competitor's reputation by "false flag" astroturfing on their posts...

I was looking for something like this just now. I really like it, thank you for making this (I assume with help from Claude)

Congrats on the launch!

Would this fit into the "1. Serialization" strategy described here? https://mattweidner.com/2024/06/04/server-architectures.html...

If so, would it run into the same issue ProseMirror-collab did as mentioned in the article? As in: A frequently updating low-latency client can lock out another high-latency client's updates.

I think for those cases you're expected to use something like this: https://developers.cloudflare.com/analytics/analytics-engine...

You should try Directus! I'm using it for a project right now and it's very nice. It has the plugin folder you mention too.

Looks very nice, but animations are very laggy for me (M1 Mac, Chrome Beta)

Maybe you can try lists on Twitter/X?

> The fact a conscious mind loses capability when brain damage happens shows quite clearly that consciousness as a process is reducible to smaller non-conscious parts though.

This does not follow.

Really strange writing...

Wonder what the Inngest team thinks about this...

Well in MacBooks there isn't actually any downward travel, it's just a solid block, there's only haptic feedback to indicate a click has been registered.

What are the features that you find Tauri lacks?

This is terrifying.

What is that important feature?

It doesn't necessarily read as snide.

It does make sense. Consider the phrase "twice as cheap"

? just have the bolded part fixed and the long part off screen ?

JSMP: "...this example is a theoretical use case where using IQ testing is not so useful. To look at something a little more realistic, let’s say a company wants to avoid people with a performance more than 2 standard deviations below the mean. (Perhaps such employees have a risk of causing large harm, which could for instance be an issue in the military.) And we again compare admitting people at random vs only taking applicants with above average IQ."

[for reference, if using IQ as an indicator for performance, 2 standard deviations below the mean would be 70 IQ]

Taleb: "The argument by psychologists to make IQ useful is of the sort: who would you like to do brain surgery on you/who would you hire in your company/who would you recommend, someone with a 90 IQ or one with 130 is ...academic. Well, you pick people on task-specific performance, which should include some filtering. In the real world you interview people from their CV (not from some IQ number sent to you as in a thought experiment), and, once you have their CV, the 62 IQ fellow is naturally eliminated. So the only think for which IQ can select, the mentaly disabled, is already weeded out in real life: he/she can’t have a degree in engineering or medicine. Which explains why IQ is unnecessary and using it is risky because you miss out on the Einsteins and Feynmans."

Perhaps you're reading too much into the literal meaning of that sentence. He's saying that this is the status quo, and the "rulers" are happy with the status quo, not that they're literally conspiring.

From the final paragraph: "... Clearly, the system was never consciously designed. It emerged from almost a century of trial and error. But it is the only explanation for why, despite our technological capacities, we are not all working 3–4 hour days."

Offer literally anything. It's geopolitics on both sides.

> when they start utilizing markets

I don't think you're familiar with the modern Chinese economy...

Google, Twitter and Facebook are all fully banned in China.

China, for one. (in Beijing atm)

In Iran people openly talk of their disdain of the government, sometimes very publicly even. It's only when you become an active political activist that things might go awry.

The same can't be said of China; People here self-censor even in personal conversations.

I think Apple wouldn't be too happy in the App Store Review process if they find out your app is uploading pictures without user interaction.