80 karma · joined December 17, 2008
There is still the possibility that everyone you give information to is tied to a single GMail account (for your own convenience), but that is still your own fault, not Google.
Once upon a time I used MySpace, and found all the info I would get on it completely useless. So I stopped using MySpace. Within the last 4 months, just about everyone in my family has started using Facebook, and I have no interest in joining Facebook whatsoever, because to me it seems like it is just a cleaner web interface to the same sort of thing I could read on MySpace.
But lately, whenever I talk to someone in my family they will ask me why I haven't joined Facebook yet. I prefer to just get in touch with my family over phone calls and in person, I don't need to drill down into every last detail of their lives on a daily basis. So I continue to remain outside of the realm of Facebook.
I do like Twitter though, and no one in my family or within my close friends is using it, and they don't want to use it. It doesn't bother me that the people I follow and who follow me on twitter are mostly people outside of my family and are not my closest friends. A lot of the things I write on Twitter aren't things I think they would care about anyways.
> A new chef at the highly rated San Francisco restaurant Ducca decided to make his mark by adding chili to some pasta dishes and grapes to others — with bad results.
I can't say anything about this specific restaurant, but this statement seems like it could just as easily be considered an opinion rather than treated as a fact.
Another consideration is that one leader may be highly skilled in a given trait while anther leader has a completely different core set of traits which force change to take place when there is a change of leadership. Changes in leadership style are typically changes that reflect the competency range of one leader compared to another.
Politics is especially filled with the sort of criticism that changes are being made "for the sake of change" so that someone can challenge if the change is meaningful, because there is no perceived value of that change to a person who disagrees with the change.
I don't know how this could even be quantified, but I disagree with the assumption that changes are typically made simply "for the sake of change".
From my perspective, the fact that these calculations do not perform correctly right out of the box using dynamic languages is the problem, and adding additional libraries is not the solution.
But... I've worked for a couple of companies that don't allow their developers (such as myself) to talk directly to their clients because any feature requests that come up in those discussions throw off project management planning and projected timelines. When you are trying to convince management that their developers should be working on XYZ feature, it is a much different world than an individual requesting a feature in such a way that it is an insult to the software developer.
Also, I don't know that my pride has ever been hurt by a feature request, but maybe that is because I'm used to working in a corporate environment and my core development strategy is not always "to make great software that delights people".
I doubt that anyone has ever gotten 80 karma points from writing a single comment, but it is difficult to use comments alone as a ranking system since there are a lot of people who just read articles and will ignore any additional commentary.
I'm sure teachers don't condone the idea of students re-using previously submitted work from another class, but I think that it is a legitimate right and just shows how ignorant some teachers are who accept papers on generic subjects.
There are probably other specific places where TurnItIn could arguably be abusive of ownership beyond fair use, but there needs to be a specific context to the situation.
Is there some sort of hidden assumption that people will never read an entire book on their computer, only on a portable device? Maybe I am just biased against the idea that no one reads a book on their computer since I do it all the time with technical books that can be purchased in pdf format.
A Kindle software app would open up (as in make available, not DRM free) a lot of books from publishers that do not have any sort of digital download of their books.
There were definitely positive things about IRC being the main communication tool, but it killed off any potential benefit that having an open-plan office would provide.
If I were to visit RSSTalker and not know whether or not the site was profitable, I would be less likely to take the time to consider cloning the site.