Amazon's Kindle for iPhone hits the App Store
engadget.com
engadget.com
The UI is distraction free (just a page of text). Page advances are done with the standard flick, and are actually faster than a kindle due to the e ink. Text looks good and sharp, and the syncing is great. I'm accessing the same content I was reading this morning and I'm on the same page. Really well done.
Obviously, there are many scenarios where the kindle is far better (any kind of longer reading) -- but I now have something I can pick up and read intermittently when I don't have my Kindle. Sweet.
Now, I really wish I could email articles / snippets. This applies to the Kindle as well. There are tons of articles in the New Yorker I'd love to forward.
I realize that this is a personal preference but it would be nice to have an option.
Which is why I don't understand the enthusiasm for this.
Getting more people locked into any digital restriction management scheme is a step backwards.
When I can get current digital books that use a non-proprietary format and can be read on my choice of hardware, then I'll be excited.
perhaps amazon is trying to do the same thing. promote the drm to get the publishers on-board, then once they have the market (though i think they do already), use their weight to convince publishers to ditch the drm.
I am skeptical that Amazon or Apple will remove the encumbrances if there is no market pressure from having the same content available in an open format.
Is there some sort of hidden assumption that people will never read an entire book on their computer, only on a portable device? Maybe I am just biased against the idea that no one reads a book on their computer since I do it all the time with technical books that can be purchased in pdf format.
A Kindle software app would open up (as in make available, not DRM free) a lot of books from publishers that do not have any sort of digital download of their books.
Very nice iPhone reading experience, clean UI, easy to setup, and fast downloads (even on 1G iPhone).
This is a little disappointing from the company that brought us 1 click ordering.
This is a great move for Amazon, leave the hardware (low profit, high maintenance) and focus on eBooks (high profit, low maintenance)
Sound strategy in the long run.
[1] blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/brierdudley/2009/02/09/amazons_jeff_bezos_explains_th.html
Once you plunk down the $350, the itch to buy a $8 - $10 book that you just heard plugged by a friend you respect is simply too hard to resist. I have little doubt that Kindle owners are buying books more frequently and in large numbers. I think you still need a Kindle device for this iPhone app to work (not sure). Considering the fact that all the book lovers I know who hate the Kindle, love reading on their iPhones, if / when Amazon disconnects the two, this will accelerate.
All I know is based on what I've seen him say. He's extremely evasive about the actual numbers for the Kindle. He cherry picks a single number: "If you take the 230,000 titles where we have Kindle editions - Kindle unit sales are already more than 10 percent of all our sales."
I believe (based on my conversations with people about this) that many people hear that from Bezos and take away the idea that the Kindle is now 10 percent of all Amazon revenue or at least all book sales.
I believe he's phrasing this in an intentionally misleading way. I think he thinks that the Kindle isn't doing that well right now, but he believes in it and doesn't want to take the stock market hit in admitting that it's going to take a long time before the Kindle truly is a big success.
"For that to happen in 14 months is very surprising. It took us 14 years to build up our physical book business."
I'm just reading between the lines. I admit could be wrong.
Numbers? That's a big statement that -- unless you're on Amazon's board, I guess -- you don't really have any idea is accurate.