65 karma · joined November 15, 2015
1. First, I run it locally on my desktop against a repository I keep on the same drive (/home/backup); then
2. I update, with rsync, a copy of this repository I keep on a dedicated server with full disk encryption; and, finally,
3. I spin up an EC2 instance, mount an S3 bucket with s3ql, and rsync the copy from the previous step up to the one I keep on this bucket.
This process is (embarrassingly) manual.
The backup repository is encrypted with Borg itself, and if I am in need of recovering something I do it from the local copy. I never mount the repository in remote locations.
I tried and tried, yet couldn’t get it to work. Documentation surely was lacking for Libreswan. But then I found Strongswan, and after a few more attempts I managed to set a tunnel as I wanted it. The documentation is much more complete, and the examples were specially helpful.
I am baffled by the choice made by RedHat, to use Libreswan as their official IPsec implementation. It gave me a “beta” feel, while Strongswan seems more solid. Plus the difference regarding documentation is like night and day.
Maybe we had different setups, so this wouldn’t apply – I used to unbind the device with the following script, and then load the `nvidia` module; the device was then available on the host:
for dev in "0000:01:00.0" "0000:01:00.1"; do
if [ -e /sys/bus/pci/devices/${dev}/driver ]; then
echo "${dev}" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/${dev}/driver/unbind
fi
doneThe Brazilian TV series 3% is I think worth of mention, as it fits very well in this space.
Regarding the article, I’m not familiar enough with the "Right to be Forgotten" directive to question the choosing of the examples opening the text, but to me it seems biased. These examples are arguably the kind of information which couldn’t be legally hidden because of public interest.
Rare possibility? Yes. But it’s a possibility. «Nothing to hide, nothing to fear» arguments cannot stand before this sort of scrutiny.
Another option is to rent a VPS/dedicated server somewhere outside the UK, with decent bandwidth and data cap, and configure your own VPN between your systems, using the rented server as the internet gateway.
Now this is more a matter of dispute, but I wouldn’t say the hacker stole the funds. They simply followed the DAO contract (not the “smart-contract”, mind you, but the one put forward by the Slock.it team on their page), according to which everything that went on the blockchain according to the DAO code was legitimate.
It could also work as a (perhaps curated) reference. Sort of like Rosetta Code, but for more high-level features – “how have projects X and Y chosen to implement this feature?”
Besides, it could serve an archival function. A quick search on the web reveals a couple of projects on this vein, but they tend to rely on storing official releases. The way I see your idea, it could be made to work in a way closer to what archive.org does for the web, archiving everything it’s permissible to, with the addition of meta information about the projects, their relationships, etc.
Not a small undertaking, but a very inspiring one!
Let’s not forget that thanks to its libre licensing this is a strategic issue, but not a technical one – recovering the removed features on macOS is a few patches away.
“Philosophy of science,” already mentioned, is probably a better fit. Once you go meta on science, after all, you are (arguably) not doing science anymore, so there is no harm in naming it a kind of philosophy.
But the most concerning issue however, in my opinion, and taking into account the amount of attention that the NTM paper got, is that (to my knowledge) all public implementations of the suggested architecture involve a great deal of guesswork. The researchers didn’t release any code; only vague details about the architecture and results that we must take on their word. The note they released is, I think, closer to being a tantalizing press release than a proper scientific report.
I am worried about my personal backups now.
I am interested in this. Can you, say, write code or read text for long hours, without having to upsize the text too much?
The political correction you ask for is USA-centric. I don’t know if the people behind blacknurse.dk are American, but, if the domain is an indication, they may not be.
This is very well done. Profile created!