owebmaster

This theory would be easy to prove IF openai was pushing high quality software. It's not.

> they're doing their best to undermine them.

Well... thanks?

This is a common populist argument

You still didn't show anything "world changing"

It also takes time to build a terrible product, using AI or not. There's no productivity gains without results.

If that's the case, do Anthropic have an even better one helping them? The Chinese labs too? Where this OpenAI "advantage" is taking them?

With the same respect, you don't either. Simping for openai don't make you part of their in group

I don't think a great model would be replaced in a week.

If the previous one was as good as worth retiring in 7 days, there's a good chance the new one is also not great.

I have seen and paid expensive designers that did a much worse job

Meanwhile they pay $500k for the same roles they want other companies to automate (using their products).

> You think its implausible for AI to replace some fraction of white collar workers?

Yes, it is. Software already did it. Better software (AI) can only marginally change what's already automated.

Most people spent 15 minutes making bad PPTs in the past now they spend 5 minutes asking ChatGPT to create one. The presentation/meeting will take the same 2 hours where most ppl will get bored.

This "productivity" gain changes nothing. Software already optimized most of it in the past 20 years, the gains now are marginal, at best incremental.

What value do you expect a 5 months of work app not launched yet to have? You might pretty much have wasted 500 hours if nobody want to pay for it.

Don't delude yourself thinking you can use their same argument.

Anthropic is betting they will capture this market, not that it exists.

Yeah not sure about that. OpenAI and oracle are already losing money because of their obligations. They are already going to the worst case scenario and it's worse than you describe.

> On every objective measure, quality is improving and the trendline is clear.

Where? I can't find one company that did "AI layoffs" and their app/services got better. Give me just one good example please

"actually we can turn lead into gold now"

Isn't it vibecoding? Turn out it's not really gold

> Is anyone even using their Figma competitor?

Yes. CC started to create canvases without me asking. The mockups look good (it's just html+css), the tool is vibecoded crap

The discussion was good to read. You seem to not want to understand that appending text to a file called MEMORY.md or whatever name doesn't reliably work and would cause another "that's on me"

It's a 3 minutes video. How can you write such a long essay about it with so many opinions without stopping 3 minutes to watch it?

Wake me up when the right wing guy in the corporations pockets is banned by mistake

You still don't have an argument and ChatGPT web app sucks.

You can't bully someone so much more powerful. Bullying is saying AI will replace devs, 10% chance of everybody dying, etc.

You might be thinking about "Good design is as little design as possible", one of the 10 principles for good design by Dieter Rams.

The fact that a 23yo junior programmer thinks like you gives me some hope

It would be really surprising if they could make it better for literally every user. The perpetual undo is just better handled by git.

That's a plain big lie. There was no court order to ban Lula's account.

Downvoted by the bots and people paid to spread lies