This is what I needed to understand what you're up to here, oddly enough.
From http://programming.witheve.com/deepdives/whateveis.html (which might not be up to date?).
731 karma · joined November 6, 2015
This is what I needed to understand what you're up to here, oddly enough.
From http://programming.witheve.com/deepdives/whateveis.html (which might not be up to date?).
Well if yours is to ask for measures so extreme that I've never even heard of them, then yes, we do.
You make responsible gun owners look like nuts. But thanks, you've done a wonderful job of illustrating the problem I was commenting on.
I'll just let yours stand as evidence of the kind of thing that happens when you ask for compromise on such a strange issue.
Perhaps you're right, and we need to treat our countries addiction to guns instead of trying to reduce the supply.
It's an honest question, but I think that part of the problem is that gun rights are at a sort of apogee in this country - I don't really have much more to give.
Here's how it feels from my point of view: I'd like it if the police could really just run a serial number (perhaps with judicial oversight, warrants, etc.), like they do on T.V.
But the right takes my genuine desire to take some sensible measures to reduce violent crime and turns it into a desire to take away all of the guns and commit some atrocity.
It's like I'm asking you if I could use your cellphone for a second to call for a ride, and you treat me like I'm definitely planning to steal it. Perhaps a sensible measure in some contexts, but it is always a fundamental statement about how little you trust me, and frankly insulting.
Many on the left, of course, do the same thing, although obviously I'm not in as good of a position to describe it.
Somehow we need to restore our trust in one another's shared values. It seems to me that a heavily partisan media has done the most to erode this trust (for example, the vicious attacks on the fundamental values of Bush and Obama), but there might be more too it.
That stuff is really hard, even when the text is ostensibly present in the PDF (as opposed to the PDF being an image of text). Thing is, it's all just "draw text" commands in the content streams (basically postscript programs). The text commands appear in no particular order and you generally have to compute the layout to see even where the spaces are (which is still a guessing game, because the PDF generator will vary the space width to achieve a visually pleasing format).
OCR is an approach that wasn't quite ready for prime time back then, so it's cool to see people working on it!
Monkey patching, done correctly, will "settle" over time. That is, once your rails app has called all the dynamic finder methods it's ever going to use, and `require`d all of the `active_support` extensions it'll need, it's done monkey patching. Of course, there are programming mistakes that can open a huge bag of worms, such as using `OpenStruct`s. Generally, anything that will smash the global method cache[1] is also going to require the kind of `iseq` deoptimization that this pull is about (in fact, smashing the global method cache is a simple case of deoptimization).
This is why deoptimization is so useful - it's almost never going to happen after your app has settled, but it's necessary to maintain correctness while `active_support` is being loaded and adding all of those yummy methods to core classes.
`call_cc` can go to hell though - I've never seen a program that uses it ;-)
[1] https://github.com/charliesome/charlie.bz/blob/master/posts/...
If used as such, it'd be really nice to be able to go the other way - a regex explainer if you will.
Not only is this the dominant view in the various recovery communities, it's supported by considerable scientific evidence - for example, addiction is well known to be inheritable, and childhood trauma is very strongly established as being predictive of addiction in later life.
I take it you don't know many addicts, especially former addicts with a mature perspective on their own addiction. There are some really good books written by folks who've been addicted and gotten over it that could clue you in on how addiction works.
> you're not seriously comparing the Desoxyn dosage
Most meth addicts start with a dose that helps them, emotionally or as a performance enhancer for work, school, sex, etc. These doses are roughly the same as those prescribed for ADHD and narcolepsy. Eventually, meth stops helping and takes control - this is the hallmark of addiction.
As for preventing use, good luck!
But I agree completely that it's more fun when you have a map or the long lost footprints to be able to zero in on foot.
jonathan [dot] j [dot] mason [at] gmail
I don't normally rage against the rich, but reading this article made me fantasize about locking a couple dozen raging alcoholics in Bill Koch's wine cellar for a week.
If someone were to put together a little app to make this sort of data collection trivial and upload it to a central (preferably cheap) repository, would people be interested in contributing their data in exchange for analysis?
Also, since this is HN, is anyone interested in building something like this? I've got an hour or two a week of spare time to chip in.
Unrelated question, mostly for OP: do you know of any publicly available databases of GI/GL info? It's really important for people with type 1 diabetes (a subject rather dear to my heart), and could also be useful for OpenAPS stuff (https://github.com/openaps).
What's perhaps more appalling is confessions made to police and prosecutors without an attorney present. The police and prosecutors can lie about the potential sentence, even threatening the suspect's life (we'll go death penalty!), drawing out a confession, and then be under no obligation to uphold their end of the "bargain".
The bottom line is that 95% of people in our prisons did not have a trial before a jury of their peers. Some of these people are very likely innocent, but because of the nature of plea bargains, they cannot challenge their sentences.
Your main barrier is experience, but if you're willing to go for a junior level position, that shouldn't be an issue.
So generally, look for companies with a more mature culture - avoid buzzwords like "rockstar" and "ninja" (secretly, everyone should do this), steer clear of "unicorns", and read the bios on a companies website, and you should be able to find a good fit.
> There’s a fine line between shutting down the Internet and policing it
Straight out of a lobbyists mouth, I'd imagine. It has the classic "true, but only in certain contexts" thing going on - sure, it's a great argument against, say, SOPA, but as an argument against a simple legal requirement that big internet players do their part to reign obviously malicious advertising, it's pretty bogus.