omscs99

Starlink isn’t a charity. If the DoD wants to use their resources, then they should negotiate with them as they would with any other business

> because women do not treat men the way she described anyway.

How would you know?

If the genders were reversed it would be binned as sexist without any support or regard for context

Why exactly should the expectation of justification go one way but not the other?

Frankly, I’ll take the same standard and apply it the other way. The author is sexist, the article is hot garbage

I’d say for me a big one is working out of office, when the clock hits 5 (and not oncall) work laptop gets closed and I don’t open it again

It’s really a little thing, but maintaining separation between workplace and home and trying to minimize that overlap works well for me

Oh wow, maybe I should go into infosec, looks like I’m already there mentally

What the hell is this thing even saying

Does the author think that redefining a bunch of words makes them “deep” or something? Either make an attempt to be understandable or don’t publish. And shame on wired for dropping the bar so low, you wouldn’t see this type of laughable shit out of a more respectable outlet like new yorker

Maybe it’s permanent for some and not for others? Either way, if you make the argument that it’s temporary, then people will push for stuff like conversion therapy

So ig because conversion therapy is harmful people make this premature conclusion that it’s permanent

Why even bother getting a degree in journalism if all you’re gonna do is churn out blog posts for a living? Why even call it journalism then? Legal protection or something?

Let’s Stop Pretending Journalism Degrees Matter - frankly if all you’re gonna do is sit in some nyc office and shit out the same platitudes, why should I pay for it when I can find the same fecal matter online for free?

Hell, I doubt most businesses even have a functional full text search for internal documents. My job certainly doesn’t, but the SVP feels the need to make noises about LLMs and throw the word “revolution” around

It’s like nobody wants to talk about reasonable solutions that incrementally make things better, everything has to be some meme “revolution”

Two different types of forbidden, one is the top down state driven kind, the other is the puritan witch burning kind. They are not the same

It seems really odd how all of these Ozempic articles have been popping up recently. Feels like there’s some shilling going on

Unrelated question: do hfts make you move out to east coast, or are there some in California?