Creationism is effectively identical to the simulation hypothesis. It's odd that people here will accept the latter while immediately dismissing the former.
796 karma · joined April 22, 2022
How many papers have the correct formula?
"There is a single base directory relative to which user-specific data files should be written. This directory is defined by the environment variable $XDG_DATA_HOME"
Where are you seeing "read-only"?
And why would it not be safe? What kind of user specific documentation did you think should go there and even if you did, why would you think it could be randomly removed by something else?
I appreciate their work however and it's a shame that Musk has tainted their efforts. He could be a decent man if he tried but he's clearly chosen a different path.
They do need planning permission of course and that's where they can be blocked.
Think more Bloomberg News than Fox News (or, for UK folk, more FT than DM).
If this is happening (which frankly I doubt) it's just corruption.
Generally we can rely on there being a day though. Can even predict sunrise and sunset.
Ask ChatGPT to fix it.
ps. On a side note, I love that vibe has come back as a word. Feels like the 60s.
Actually I think that's a reasonable argument. I've not designed a language myself (other than toy experiments) so I'm hesitant to denigrate other people's design choices because even with my limited experience I'm aware that there are always compromises.
Similarly, I'm not impressed by literary critics whose own writing is unimpressive.
A fair number of my family are teachers so check your facts before trying your lazy assertions.
Tell me you seriously didn't notice this.
It would be nice to have a VCS that could manage these more effectively but most binary formats don't lend themselves to that, even when it might be an additional layer to an image.
I reckon there's still room for better image and video formats that would work better with VCS.
Nice to see this ancient practice reinstated in recruitment with resumés.
I might be wrong but if I'm not that's a serious problem for AI companies.
Also, apparently it's pretty common for people to think in words and have an internal monologue. I hadn't realized this was a thing until recently but it seems many people don't think abstractly as you've described.
No, it looks like an exponential all the way to the top of the curve. And the natural reaction when you consider it an s-curve is to think you're near the top. Unfortunately near the top looks exactly the same as near the bottom, so you might consider that you're nowhere near the top and that there's no reason you should be.
Then you go on to speculate about tech that didn't exist 3 years ago and extrapolate 75 years in the future.
No one has any idea what we'll have in 10 years time never mind 75. Even linearly, it's like someone from 1950 trying to guess about 2025.
It would be nice if the UI made that easy to do.
As an example, I know of an instance where the LLM claimed it had tried a test on its laptop. This obviously isn't true so the user argued with it. But they'd originally told it that it was a Senior Software Engineer so playing that role, saying you tested locally is fine.
As soon as you start arguing with those minor points you break the context; now it's both a Software Engineer and an LLM. Of course you get confused responses if you do that.
Possibly. Have you grabbed that domain? Might be worth doing.
This makes logical sense: you don't want a model to get creative if you need functioning code, but if you want a story idea it should basically be all hallucination.
I think it makes sense to have different models for these tasks.