142 karma · joined June 10, 2016
Your posting doesn't give me the impression that you're very familiar with "science".
If I understand the author right, the big companies are allowed to set up caching servers at ISPs.
Isn't this basically a CDN? If you spin up your own screaming start-up you would first go with akamai or whatever and if you reach sufficient scale you set up your own agreements with ISPs.
Is the blog basically arguing for making it illegal to cut out the middle man here?
Then all the network traffic (a sizable fraction of the entire internet traffic), transcoding & upkeep for all these things. That's only VoD.
Then there's live video which is basically the entire thing above with the additional constraint that there's less room for error and latency.
Some other services tried live video as well, e.g. Netflix or Apple for some keynotes in the past.
For Netflix I recall a few were covered in the media, e.g.: https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/16/23685828/netflix-love-is-....
For reference, the first few minutes of these links:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1osi_pQcUdM - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjnKuhcfB6U
E.g. my mother even has Office 365 and still constantly gets offers to upgrade to Office 365 shoved in her face. With the pathetic shit that MS is pulling these days I wouldn't put it beyond them to somehow be able to sign up & pay twice for Office.
Can the people working at Microsoft chime in whether they feel any shame? I'm sure it's great for their metrics but it's shows 0% respect for users and also themselves. Some journalist should ask Satya how he feels about being the CEO of the largest panhandler organization in the history of mankind.
Netflix might be doing weird stuff but 1899 is a really bad example because the mistake there was actually greenlighting the first season.
Still, I got hired as Data Scientist. The money was good, but I didn't believe in the field and was kinda ashamed of the title (though it did seem to impress people - I think rural Europe is a few year behinds).
After 3 years I left for SWE SRE and my only regret is not doing that earlier. Decent grasp of SQL and a bit of handwavy knowledge about stats comes in handier than expected.
What an idiotic thread. Would downvote if I had enough karma to do so.
They figured out that I made my account a few months before my 18th birthday and permanently locked my account.
It seems all of this is arbitrary more or less random bullshit.
Also, I think it doesn't enforce the limits but counts down letters and if you're above the 50 chars for the message it shows a negative char count in bright red (which makes me reconsider what I want to tell my coworkers in that message).
The other points should be fulfilled.
My impression is that Fork captures how git actually works better than some of the other GUI tools and it has a lot of handy features that make certain tasks a pleasure instead of a chore (common rebasing things, add/deleting/changing local/remote branches, splitting up changes in single files into multiple commits - this is maybe be an antipattern but I do it frequently enough).
Also, it's very cheap. I hope they make enough money with it to continue development.
edit: misread your question - removed the stupid joke.
Our data is quite complicated and needs a lot of custom code & filtering. Even relatively simple analytical questions need some custom code, if people don't want to do almost everything manually (i.e.: Origin, Export to Excel, crop and move around data...).
Over the years I built up libraries and functions for some of these tasks and with Streamlit I can just slap a sufficiently nice interactive GUI on top in 1-2 hours and iterate the analysis live during a call (give them the URL and ask what additional filters, visualizations they would need, adapt the code in the background and they see the results instantly).
Overall, congratulations - well earned. Also, I considered applying for a position there and regret not doing so.
I spent a few minutes fixing the first few fields but then decided it's not worth the effort and just submitted it as is.
Also, as an addition: Their career site is so slow and amateurish that I still worry about it being phishing site. I googled a little bit and other people had a similar impression.
Stuff moves around for no reason (some graph layouting algorithm with easing I guess), the looping is bad and it's annoying to wait for the changes and as they happen instantly
A simple picture for each transition would have been simpler to implement and actually showed something.
E.g. in my theses all figures (except one in my first thesis) were made with TiKZ with colors and definitions defined in a file that is "imported" during compilation.
This allowed me to fine tune various parts (colors, ...) without having to touch each figure again. Also, all the data files are stored as CSV and read/processed by LaTeX. Between handing in my thesis and publishing the short-paper version of it for a conference I could rerun my analysis (to include the most recent data) with a single command and then just recompile the document to have all figures updated.
The thesis: https://www.ac.tuwien.ac.at/files/pub/hinteregger_18.pdf
And TikZ graphics play somewhat nice with the beamer package. I found it easier to define transitions in technical figures with TikZ/beamer than with PowerPoint or any other tool so far.
In a summer internship I worked on the documentation of a project that tried to optimize pillar-placement for skilifts. This was very Math/Physics heavy.
With TikZ I could define various parts (e.g. pillar, rope, gondola) as "function" and then create figures that combined these parts.
I.e: - place pillars at these locations - connect them with ropes obeying some formula - put gondolas along the rope with some defined distance
Important points where marked with coordinates automatically, allowing explanatory nodes (text box with arrow or paths with labels) to be added (with full LaTeX support).