I agree, I'm just struggling to differentiate what BB offers that MMTX does not, so I can identify if there's a USP. If it's a passion project to scratch a personal itch, that's also great!
Also, can you share your latency measuring methodology?
4,772 karma · joined April 21, 2016
I agree, I'm just struggling to differentiate what BB offers that MMTX does not, so I can identify if there's a USP. If it's a passion project to scratch a personal itch, that's also great!
Also, can you share your latency measuring methodology?
I'm so glad we're back at this world. I had a laptop in 2011 that developed a fault on it's 16:10 (1920x1200) screen, Dell ran out of replacement parts and laptops had standardised on 16:9 screens by this point, so they ended up replacing the entire laptop with one with a 16:9 (1920x1080) screen.
I wasn't thrilled at the loss of pixels.
You can MITM the traffic, and continue to deliver the traffic using a self signed certificate that you’ve trusted on your mobile device, and boom, you can capture the traffic at your proxy point and be happy.
A lot of mobile apps use certificate pinning to ensure that the backend certificate matches what the app expects. Now your self signed certificate, even though it’s trusted at the OS level, no longer matches the certificate that the app is expecting, and no data is exchanged after TLS handshake fails.
Isn’t it equally reasonable to assume the accused is innocent until proven guilty?
This makes it sounds like the way AppleCare works is incompatible with eSIMs, as I’m required to reset my old phone before they’re able to pull out the replacement handset and allow me to activate it.
The “E2EE marketing” around RCS applies solely to messages sent between Google Android devices on both sides. Otherwise, RCS is plain text like SMS. The carrier can read it all. This includes Apple’s implementation.
The idea that something a two year old does is a suitable basis for the foundations of society as a whole is both hilarious and terrifying. Two year olds are tyrants.
The history I recall is very much a academics designing theoretical standards vs operators who actually implement the damn things.
The academics designed the standards around the use of SLAAC deliberately and intentionally. DHCPv6 was the ‘hack’ that operators implemented after the fact.
I’m sure there’s an RFC somewhere that’ll prove this one way or another, if anyone else reading this cares enough to determine for sure (Duty Calls).
…
> Off topic: blog posts, sign-up pages, newsletters, lists, and other reading material. Those can't be tried out, so can't be Show HNs. Make a regular submission instead.
It’s not an unreasonable position to take, and this site is US centric.
Can you elaborate and/or link me to anything related to this?
I still had a valid boarding pass. Nothing went wrong at the airport, besides Ryanair failing to follow correct overbooking procedure. Fortunately in that instance, had they refused boarding on me, I would have suffered zero inconvenience, and have received 350 euros compensation and a flight the next day. In a way, I wish they had refused me that day.
If you use postfix & dovecot, the setting that might help you is recipient_delimiter
I was in London when I scheduled a video call with someone in New York. When we actually took the call, I was in Spain and he was in Chicago.
I can’t think of any timezone that could have been attached to that meeting to make it useful at the time of creation. I absolutely expect my machine to be able to tell me what the local time of the meeting is when its timezone changes.
So feel free to add my anecdote to yours, and derive nothing statistically significant besides that I fly a route that is only intermittently popular.
..I'm also flexible on dates so I deliberately book cheaper days, which may make for self selection in this way.
The 'rules' state that they're supposed to ask for volunteers, but in this instance, they didn't. I was just withheld from boarding until they confirmed they had a seat for me.
You might be better off linking to the definition of open source, per the OSI, since 2006:
Eitherway, this is why open source zealots tend to specifically say F/LOSS (free / libre open source software), to avoid any ambiguity with people who like to claim 'open source' is ambiguous and easily conflated with 'source available'.
...That there are so many of them proves their own point, I guess!
Agreed, but if you drink them exclusively for a few weeks, your taste buds and brain will reframe around them, and it'll cease to be a problem. I did this with Brewdog's Punk AF, and after 2 weeks on that, most non-alcoholic beers triggered my brain's "I'm drinking beer!" response.
It's a lot of work for overpriced soft drinks, and isn't for everyone.
Also, I'm back to drinking real beer again anyway.
> How are you consuming crypto? What commercial or industrial process are being used?
What rights does holding bitcoin confer to the holder? I get no dividends, coupons, principle repayments or potential profit shares.
We’ve nicely entered why this argument still rages on. It doesn’t fit cleanly into either definition.
Thomas’ and Thomas’s are the same thing.
I put my hands out, count to the third finger from the left, and put that finger down. I then count the fingers to the left (2) and count the fingers to the right (2 + hand aka 5) and conclude 27.
I have memorised the technique, but I definitely never memorised my nine times table. If you’d said ‘6’, then the answer would be different, as I’d actually have to sing a song to get to the answer.
VLC: App Stores Were a Mistake (twitter.com/videolan) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39798565
More here: https://mjtsai.com/blog/2024/04/19/vlc-vs-the-app-stores/
> Currently, we cannot update VLC on Windows Store, and we cannot update VLC on Android Play Store, without reducing security or dropping a lot of users…
> If you do wonder why we don’t update VLC on the Windows Store or why VLC/iOS can’t connect properly to OneDrive shares, it’s because Microsoft Kafkaïesque bureaucracy refuses to help us.
So maybe you don’t want to use centralised app stores with commercial control, and instead want to download software directly from the authors.